Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Understanding abstract expository texts

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9616296
AutoresJos Beishuizen, J J Beishuizen (Leiden University, autor correspondente), Evelien Stoutjesdijk (Leiden University), Sandra Spuijbroek (Leiden University), Samantha Bouwmeester (0000-0003-1771-0546, Leiden University), Hanneke Van der Geest (Leiden University)
Ano2002
Volume72
Fascículo2
Páginas279-297
Data de publicação2002-06-01
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoBritish Journal of Educational Psychology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0007-0998 • E-ISSN: 2044-8279
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1348/000709902158892
PMID12028613
OpenAlexW2025462841
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1

Background: This study dealt with the question whether abstract concepts and rules can be directly taught or can only be explained by using examples. The issue, known as Meno's Paradox, was addressed in the context of understanding expository texts. Aims: We set out to show the indispensability of examples in the process of acquiring knowledge of concepts and rules. By blocking any possibility of linking concepts to examples we hoped to show the understanding of abstract concepts is impossible without a concrete context of interpretation. Samples: In two experiments, secondary school students (17 years of age) and undergraduate university students were asked to study expository texts with no examples or with many examples. Methods: In Experiment 1, two existing texts were manipulated by either adding examples or replacing specific concepts by more ambiguous concepts. In Experiment 2, two expository texts (one with rules, one with examples) on the law of large numbers were developed. Apart from that, a questionnaire to assess students' habit of concrete elaboration whilst studying expository texts was administered. Results: Experiment 1 revealed that an expository text with ambiguous terms is difficult to understand. This evidence supported our claim that a concrete context of interpretation is indispensable. However, there was no difference in understanding of texts with many or few examples. An explanation might be that students were able to think of relevant examples themselves. Evidence for this active way of text comprehension was found in Experiment 2. An interaction between content (abstract, concrete) and learning style (high or low on concrete elaboration) showed up. Students high on concrete elaboration understood the abstract text better than students low on concrete elaboration. The reverse held for the concrete text. Conclusion: So, support was found for the indispensability of concrete examples, which should be available in the reader's memory or provided in the text

Cognitive psychology · Comprehension · Context (archaeology) · Elaboration · Habit · Humanities · Interpretation (philosophy) · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Process (computing) · Rhetorical modes · Set (abstract data type) · Computer Science · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes · Writing and Handwriting Education

  • Psychological Testing in a Multicultural Society

    A P Craig, Anita Craig et al.•European Journal of Intercultural…•2002

Citações por ano0,04
Intervalo de citações2002 - 2002 (1)
Altamente citadoNão

Ferramentas

Abrir DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae