Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Advice‐taking in carbon footprint assessments

How psychological and cultural factors shape reliance on experts' advice

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9620239
AutoresIrmak Sancar (0009-0003-0505-9829, Department of Communication and Cognition, Tilburg Center of Cognition and Communication Tilburg University Tilburg The Netherlands), Kenzo Nera (0000-0001-8518-386X, Center for Social and Cultural Psychology Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium), Céline Schöpfer (0000-0001-5111-9245, Philosophy Department and Swiss Center for Affective Sciences University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland), François Tomas (0000-0003-0197-3368, Department of Communication and Cognition, Tilburg Center of Cognition and Communication Tilburg University Tilburg The Netherlands, autor correspondente)
Ano2025
Data de publicação2025-09-09
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoBritish Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0007-1269 • E-ISSN: 2044-8295
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/bjop.70026
PMID40926337
OpenAlexW4414085223
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas73

In this pre‐registered experiment conducted in the Netherlands and Türkiye ( N total = 550), we investigated how the source of advice (peer vs. expert) influences people's decision‐making when assessing the carbon footprint of a flight between two cities. We also examined whether this effect was influenced by their conspiracy mentality, collective narcissism, epistemic individualism, and climate change scepticism. Our findings suggest that people overall rely more on experts' advice than peers', especially in the Netherlands compared with Türkiye. Moreover, individuals high in conspiracy beliefs, epistemic individualism, and collective narcissism reduced the weight advantage typically given to expert advice over peer advice. Only a specific form of climate change scepticism (i.e., trend scepticism) showed similar effects. Overall, our results indicate that individuals who value their own opinion and harbour distrust towards experts or science tend to discount expert advice

Advice (programming) · Carbon Footprint · Climate science · Cynicism · Distrust · Narcissism · Skepticism · Value (mathematics) · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Environmental Education and Sustainability

  • Social Cognition

    Susan T Fiske, Shelley E Taylor et al.•Social Cognition•2013

  • Beyond “Monologicality”? Exploring Conspiracist Worldviews

    Open Access•B Franks, Adrian Bangerter et al.•Frontiers in Psychology•2017

  • Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories

    Open Access•Anthony Lantian, Dominique Muller et al.•International Review of Social…•2016

  • Taking Advice

    Open Access•Nigel Harvey, Ilan Fischer•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1997

  • Conspiracy Theory Belief

    Open Access•Joseph M Pierre•Review of Philosophy and Psychology•2023

  • A meta-analysis of the weight of advice in decision-making

    Open Access•Phoebe E Bailey, Tarren Leon et al.•Current Psychology•2023

  • Science Skepticism Across 24 Countries

    Open Access•Bastiaan T Rutjens, Nikhil Kumar Sengupta et al.•Social Psychological and…•2022

  • Contesting epistemic authority

    Open Access•J Harambam, Stef Aupers•Public Understanding of Science•2015

  • What is so special about conspiracy theories? Conceptually distinguishing beliefs in conspiracy theories from conspiracy beliefs in psychological research

    Open Access•Kenzo Nera, Céline Schöpfer•Theory & Psychology•2023

  • Measuring Individual Differences in Generic Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Across Cultures

    Open Access•Martin Bruder, Peter Haffke et al.•Frontiers in Psychology•2013

  • Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change

    Open Access•Matthew J Hornsey, E A Harris et al.•Nature Climate Change•2016

  • Epistemic Vigilance

    Open Access•Dan Sperber, Fabrice Clément et al.•Mind & Language•2010

  • Les théories du complot et le paradoxe de l’individualisme épistémique

    Jean-Baptiste Guillon•Diogène•2019

  • How Media, Information Sources, and Trust Shape Climate Change Denial or Doubt

    Open Access•Dilshani Sarathchandra, Kristin Haltinner•Social Currents•2023

  • How Believing Climate Change is a “Hoax” Shapes Climate Skepticism in the United States

    Dilshani Sarathchandra, Kristin Haltinner•Environmental Sociology•2020

  • Mistrust and misinformation

    Open Access•Joseph M Pierre•Journal of Social and Political…•2020

  • Climate Change in the Mainstream Turkish Press

    Mehmet Ali Üzelgün, P Castro•Mass Communication & Society•2015

  • Stand out of my sunlight

    Open Access•Paul Bertin, Kenzo Nera et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2021

  • The role of conspiracy mentality in denial of science and susceptibility to viral deception about science

    Open Access•Asheley R Landrum, Alex Olshansky•Politics and the Life Sciences•2019

  • Cooling down the future

    Simona–Nicoleta Vulpe•The Social Science Journal•2020

  • At what sample size do correlations stabilize

    Open Access•Felix Schönbrodt, Felix D Schönbrodt et al.•Journal of Research in Personality•2013

  • How paranoid are conspiracy believers? Toward a more fine‐grained understanding of the connect and disconnect between paranoia and belief in conspiracy theories

    Open Access•Roland Imhoff, Pia Lamberty•European Journal of Social…•2018

  • Epistemic authority

    Open Access•Jan Constantin, Thomas Grundmann•Synthese•2020

  • Malevolent intentions and secret coordination. Dissecting cognitive processes in conspiracy beliefs via diffusion modeling

    Open Access•Marius Frenken, Roland Imhoff•Journal of Experimental Social…•2022

  • Reactions to policy action

    Open Access•James Patterson, Ksenia Anisimova et al.•Policy Sciences•2025

  • Do Populists Listen to Expertise? A Five-Country Study of Authority, Arguments, and Expert Sources

    Open Access•Adam Peresman, Lars Thorup Larsen et al.•Political Studies•2025

  • Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans

    Nyla R Branscombe, Michael T Schmitt et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1999

  • Collective narcissism and its social consequences

    Agnieszka Golec De Zavala, Aleksandra Cichocka et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2009

  • The social consequences of conspiracism

    Open Access•Daniel Jolley, Karen M Douglas•British Journal of Psychology•2014

  • How belief in conspiracy theories could harm sustainability

    Open Access•Jan-Willem Van Prooijen, Jakub Šrol et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2025

  • Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries

    Open Access•Viktoria Cologna, Niels G Mede et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2025

  • I Am Not a Conspiracy Theorist

    Open Access•J Harambam, Stef Auper et al.•Cultural Sociology•2017

  • The Nature and Nuance of Climate Change Skepticism in the United States

    Open Access•Kristin Haltinner, Dilshani Sarathchandra•Rural Sociology•2021

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae