Ignoring Irrelevant Information
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9620460 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Patrick Rabbitt (Medical Research Council, autor correspondente), P M A Rabbitt |
| Ano | 1964 |
| Volume | 55 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 403-414 |
| Data de publicação | 1964-11-01 |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | British Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0007-1269 • E-ISSN: 2044-8295 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1964.tb00925.x |
| PMID | 14237881 |
| OpenAlex | W1975861865 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 6 |
The task of scanning a visual display to identify certain symbols may involve ignoring the presence of others, and so may be compared with Donders's 1862 study of the ‘ c ‐reaction’, in which a response was required to only one of a set of five possible phonemes presented to a subject in random succession. For visual displays of letters of the alphabet the time required to ignore a symbol as irrelevant is shown to depend upon the vocabulary of items for which search is conducted. Incidental learning of irrelevant symbols is shown to be related to the same variable. It is shown that performance in situations of this type is analogous to that in which subjects respond to groups of stimuli rather than to particular items, and stimulus and response entropy are independently varied
Alphabet · Cognitive psychology · Linguistics · Stimulus (psychology) · Vocabulary · Advanced Text Analysis Techniques · Cognitive Science and Education Research · Communication · Multisensory perception and integration · Psychology
Puffery in Advertisements
Anticipating Discussion about a Product
Recommendation or Evaluation? Task Sensitivity in Information Source Selection
Controlled and automatic human information processing
A feature-integration theory of attention
Effects of repeated testing in a pen-and-paper test of selective attention (Fair-2)
| Citações por ano | 0,12 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 1977 - 2022 (46) |
| Altamente citado | Não |