Bonjour's Objection to Traditional Foundationalism

Empirical foundationalism affirms that some empirical beliefs a person holds (at a time) have a degree of justification or warrant that does not derive from their being inferable from other empirical beliefs the person holds. Such beliefs are basic for the person (at the time). In his recent book Laurence Bonjour claims that foundationalism faces the following problem: The basic problem confronting empirical foundationalism ... is how the basic or foundational empirical beliefs to which it appeals are themselves justified or warranted or in some way given positive epistemic standing, while still preserving their status as basic. This problem amounts to a dilemma: if there is no justification, basic beliefs are rendered epistemically arbitrary, thereby fatally impugning the very claim of foundationalism to constitute a theory of epistemic justification; while a justification which appeals to further premises of some sort threatens to begin anew the regress of justification which it is the whole point of foundationalism to avoid

Dilemma · Economics · Epistemology · Foundationalism · Warrant · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science

• An analysis of knowledge and valuation .

  Clarence Irving Lewis•An analysis of knowledge and…•1962

  Incluir item

• The structure of empirical knowledge

  Laurence Bonjour•The structure of empirical…•1985

  Incluir item

• Person and Object

  Virgil C Aldrich, Roderick M Chisholm•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1978

  Incluir item

• Contemporary theories of knowledge

  John L Pollock•Contemporary theories of knowledge•1999

  Incluir item

• The problems of philosophy

  Bertrand Russell•The problems of philosophy•2008

  Incluir item

• Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation

  Donald Davidson, Donald Herbert Davidson•Inquiries into truth and…•2001

  Incluir item