Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Membership and Employment in an Egalitarian Cooperative

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9726562
AutoresJohn P Bonin (autor correspondente)
Ano1984
Volume51
Fascículo203
Páginas295
Data de publicação1984-08-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoEconomica (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0013-0427 • E-ISSN: 1468-0335
EditoraJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2554547
OpenAlexW2057271883
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas4
Referências citadas2

Economic models of the labour-managed firm often stress inefficiencies and perverse behaviour. In his seminal work, Ward (1958) considers a firm in which dividend, not profit, is maximized. Dividend is defined as value-added net of fixed costs, divided by the number of workers. For the short-run problem with the capital stock fixed, Ward shows that: the usual demand signals would induce perverse responses, i.e. contraction (expansion) when demand increases (decreases); workers will not move between firms to equate marginal products of labour; and the dividend-maximizing firm will respond to an increase in fixed cost by increasing the number of workers. These results are disconcerting in that they cast doubt on product market stability due to downward-sloping supply curves, on the achievement of an efficient allocation of resources, and on the formulation of consistent policy prescriptions in a labour-managed economy. Ward's fundamental result-that dividend maximization leads to a contraction (expansion) of the number of workers in the firm as output price increases (decreases)-is remarkably robust. It has its analogue in the multi-product firm (Domar, 1966); it is not eliminated when labour-leisure considerations are introduced (Ireland and Law, 1981); and it applies to variations in expected price when uncertainty is introduced (Bonin, 1980). However, the appropriateness of modelling the producer cooperative as a firm in which the number of workers can be varied freely to maximize dividend has been criticized. Robinson (1967) and Vanek (1969) argue that a true collective would not dismiss some of the brethren in exchange for small increments in the income of the remaining members. Interestingly, this solidarity position can be supported by the individual self-interest-maximizing behaviour of a representative member (Bonin, 1981)

Economics · Labour economics · Cooperative Studies and Economics · Economic theories and models · Taxation and Compliance Studies

  • Behavior of Participatory Firms in Yugoslavia

    Janez Prašnikar, Jan Svejnar et al.•The Review of Economics and…•1994

  • The Theory of the Labour-Managed Firm Revisited

    Nava Kahana, Shmuel Nitzan•The Economic Journal•1993

  • Does it pay to cooperate? The case of cooperatives in the Mexican manufacturing sector

    Open Access•Pablo Cotler•Annals of Public and Cooperative…•2020

  • Embeddedness, cooperation and popular-economy firms in the informal sector

    Open Access•Marthe Nyssens, Bruno Van der Linden•Journal of Development Economics•2000

  • On the 'Employment' Decision of a Labour-Managed Firm

    A A Brewer, Anthony Brewer et al.•Economica•1982

  • The Theory of Labour-Managed Firms and of Profit Sharing

    J E Meade•The Economic Journal•1972

Obras citantes distintas4
Citações por ano0,12
Intervalo de citações1993 - 2020 (28)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae