Back to the Future
Contrasting Scientific Styles in Understanding Reading
Dados Bibliográficos
In this rejoinder to Willis, Smagorinsky, and Douglas (this issue of Educational Researcher), the authors discuss how many of the points raised by Willis and Smagorinsky regarding their original article, which appeared in the March 2009 issue of Educational Researcher, are concerned less with the methods themselves than with different styles of science. The authors of this rejoinder examine their differing styles of science, using Stanovich’s 2003 framework, and call for consilience and the understanding that multiple perspectives and methods are needed to solve the important and perplexing problems that students and teachers will face in the 21st century
Consilience · Educational research · Epistemology · Face (sociological concept · Linguistics · Reading (process · Social science · Sociology · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development
Resources, Instruction, and Research
How Psychological Science Informs the Teaching of Reading
Reading
Ways with Words
Examining the Communication Skills of a Young Cochlear Implant Pioneer
Sharpening Our Focus in Measuring Classroom Instruction
The ISI Classroom Observation System
Edu Poli tical Research
The Cultural Practice of Reading and the Standardized Assessment of Reading Instruction
Understanding Reading
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,06 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2010 - 2010 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |