Considering Interest and Action
Analyzing Types of Questions Explored by Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9734629 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Karen D Thompson (0000-0003-1597-8194, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, autor correspondente), Martha I Martinez (0000-0002-3412-9553, Oregon Department of Education), Chelsea Clinton (Oregon Department of Education), Guadalupe Díaz (0000-0001-7176-8322, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA) |
| Ano | 2017 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Fascículo | 8 |
| Páginas | 464-473 |
| Data de publicação | 2017-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Educational Researcher (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0013-189X • E-ISSN: 1935-102X |
| Editora | American Educational Research Association (AERA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3102/0013189x17733965 |
| OpenAlex | W2763510061 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 11 |
| Referências citadas | 23 |
Researcher-practitioner partnerships have gained increasing prominence within education in recent years, yet scholarship on partnerships and tools to guide partnerships’ work remain in their infancy. Drawing on our own work in a partnership as well as analysis of abstracts for the 41 partnerships funded by the Institute of Education Sciences and the Spencer Foundation, we analyze the prevalence of four types of research questions—data quality, information gathering, evaluation, and design questions—within partnerships and reflect on the constraints and affordances of each question type for partnerships. We argue that explicitly considering the extent to which possible questions are of high interest and are actionable for both researchers and practitioners may increase the likelihood that the needs of both parties will be met and that partnerships can truly serve as a tool for meaningful improvement in education
Action (physics · Affordance · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Foundation (evidence · General partnership · Pedagogy · Political science · Public relations · Quality (philosophy · Scholarship · Sociology · Work (physics · Educational Assessment and Improvement · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Psychology · Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Coming Together in the Fight Against Intimate Partner Violence
A Collaborative Problem-Solving Approach to Improving District Attendance Policy
Political Considerations for Establishing Research-Practice Partnerships in Pursuit of Equity
Whose Agenda is It? Navigating the Politics of Setting the Research Agenda in Education Research-Practice Partnerships
Are Research-Practice Partnerships Responsive to Partners’ Needs? Exploring Research Activities During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Politics at the Boundary
Supporting Use of Data and Evidence from Early Warning Indicator Systems in Research–Practice Partnerships
Situated Partnership
A multimodal approach to support teacher, researcher and AI collaboration in STEM +C learning environments
Broadening our Understanding of how Research-Practice Partnerships Support Educational Improvement and Equitable Transformation
Education Research-Practice Partnerships
Design Research
Conceptualizing Research–Practice Partnerships as Joint Work at Boundaries
Case Study Research
The Effects of Changing Test‐Based Policies for Reclassifying English Learners
Toward a New Classification of Nonexperimental Quantitative Research
Research–Practice Partnerships in Education
Wallace Foundation Distinguished Lecture
Innovating at the Nexus of Impact and Improvement
Relevance to Practice as a Criterion for Rigor
Leveled and Exclusionary Tracking
Evaluating English Learner Reclassification Policy Effects Across Districts
Investigating Whether and When English Learners Are Reclassified Into Mainstream Classrooms in the United States
Reclassification Patterns Among Latino English Learner Students in Bilingual, Dual Immersion, and English Immersion Classrooms
Word Generation Randomized Trial
The situativity of knowing, learning, and research
| Obras citantes distintas | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,83 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 11 |