Piety, Profit and Public Service in the Financial Revolution
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9737405 |
|---|---|
| Autores | K Yamamoto (0009-0007-3151-9234) |
| Ano | 2011 |
| Volume | 126 |
| Fascículo | 521 |
| Páginas | 806-834 |
| Data de publicação | 2011-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | The English Historical Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0013-8266 • E-ISSN: 1477-4534 |
| Editora | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ehr/cer201 |
| OpenAlex | W2319293858 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 5 |
This article reconsiders, through the case study of High Tory MP Sir Humphrey Mackworth (1657-1727), an influential thesis that core values of the landed class were incompatible with ‘projects’—new speculative commercial and industrial ventures floated in the emerging stock market. Rather than presupposing inherent tension between Whig and Tory, or Court and Country, the article explores how the High Tory, critical of Whig finance, conceptualized and lent legitimacy to his mining scheme. The first section reviews the historiography and the second introduces the case study. The article then shows that Mackworth viewed and promoted his business as a pursuit of piety, profit, and public service. This godly framework, it will be shown, was no rhetorical ornament: it even influenced how Mackworth understood the frauds he committed, which made him a notorious swindler but also an ‘innovative entrepreneur’ contributing to local economic development
Business · Economics · For profit · Library science · Management · Neoclassical economics · Non profit · Piety · Political science · Profit (economics · Public service · Service (business · Sociology · Classics · Computer Science · Finance · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History · Law · Marketing · Public Administration
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,36 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2012 - 2024 (13) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 4 |