Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Borderline Citizens

Women, Gender, and Political Culture in Britain, 1815-1867

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9740893
AutoresJohn Prest (autor correspondente)
Ano2010
Volume125
Fascículo516
Páginas1261-1263
Data de publicação2010-10-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoThe English Historical Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0013-8266 • E-ISSN: 1477-4534
EditoraOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/ehr/ceq248
OpenAlexW2325339691
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas7

Studies of women and politics in this period start with the statutory and common-law barriers to their participation. The statutory ones were the male qualification for electors inserted into the 1832 Reform Act for England and Wales and the Municipal Corporations Reform Act of 1835, and the ending of the practice whereby the freemen's franchise could be passed on like a piece of property through a daughter to her husband. There were some statutory opportunities for women to take part in elections through the rate-paying qualifications set up under general Acts relating to the poor law and public health (‘Words importing the Masculine Gender shall include Females’, 11 and 12 Vict. c. 63 s.2), and a trawl through local Acts might reveal more. But not for all, or even for many; the Jus mariti or common-law rule that a wife's property and earnings belonged to her husband stood in the way. Time and again Kathryn Gleadle returns to the point that the women who could take part in politics were those with an income or property of their own, single women—spinsters and widows—together with a minute number of married women whose husbands made money over to them through a trust. That said, we should not underestimate the number of middle-class spinsters living independently, who (inspired perhaps by Harriet Martineau and evangelical perceptions of usefulness) participated in politics by delivering anti-revolutionary and teetotal tracts to working men. Nor, Gleadle suggests, should we overlook widows living in more expansive circumstances who succeeded in carrying on the businesses which had ruined their husbands’ health. But the majority had to wait until the Married Women's Property Act of 1882 gave married women too a right to their own income and property

Business · Daughter · Earnings · Franchise · Lawsuit · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Statutory law · Wife · Gender Studies · Historical Gender and Feminism Studies · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · Law

  • Organizing Democracy

    Open Access•Henk Te Velde, Maartje Janse•Organizing Democracy•2017

  • The Public Life of Charlotte Carmichael Stopes

    Stephanie Green•Women s History Review•2017

  • A Glass Half Full'? Women's history in the UK

    John Purvis, June Purvis•Women s History Review•2018

  • Granny thinking what she is going to write in her book

    Lucinda Matthews-Jones•Women s History Review•2017

  • Patrice Bouche, Shirley Doulière et Margaret Gillespie (dir.), La place des femmes dans l’espace public, 1800-1939, Grande- Bretagne, Irlande, Empire

    Open Access•Véronique Molinari•Revue française de civilisation…•2022

  • Patrice Bouche, Shirley Doulière et Margaret Gillespie, La place des femmes dans l’espace public, 1800-1939, Grande- Bretagne, Irlande, Empire

    Open Access•Véronique Molinari•Revue française de civilisation…•2022

  • The Too Clever by Half People’ and Parliament

    Open Access•William Foote Whyte, William Whyte•Parliamentary History•2018

Obras citantes distintas7
Citações por ano0,78
Intervalo de citações2017 - 2022 (6)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae