Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Testimony, Tyranny and Treason

The Witnesses at Charles I’s Trial

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9742159
AutoresEdward Vallance (0000-0002-0622-2769, University of Roehampton, autor correspondente)
Ano2021
Volume136
Fascículo581
Páginas867-893
Data de publicação2021-11-11
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoThe English Historical Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0013-8266 • E-ISSN: 1477-4534
EditoraOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/ehr/ceab272
OpenAlexW3207822090
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas6

The trial and execution of Charles I have been the subject of considerable historical study, especially in the last twenty years. One aspect of the trial, however, remains largely unexplored: the role of witness testimony. The witness depositions received on 24 and 25 January 1649 have sometimes been dismissed as a mere stalling tactic, intended to provide Charles with further time to consider entering a plea. In contrast, this article contends that the witnesses’ depositions shed important new light on the trial. Exploring the witnesses’ backgrounds allows us to connect individuals with the regiments of regicides such as John Hewson and John Barkstead. These connections, through the army petitions of 1648, also link the witnesses’ testimony and, in broader terms, the trial, with the radical ideas of justice embodied in the Levellers’ ‘Large Petition’. Connecting the trial with the arguments made in the petitions for justice of the autumn and winter of 1648/9 also allows us to reconsider the importance of the concept of ‘blood guilt’. This article suggests that, far from being marginal to the king’s trial, the multi-faceted idea of blood guilt not only influenced the court’s procedure (in terms of the calling of multiple witnesses) but also was central to many of the witness depositions. Finally, drawing on both historical and philosophical work on personal testimony, the article suggests that the witness depositions may be connected to the broader, non-legal purposes of ‘witnessing’ in offering narratives of personal suffering

Art · Economic Justice · Embodied cognition · Epistemology · Literature · Narrative · Plea · Political science · Sociology · Subject (documents · Witness · Historical Art and Culture Studies · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History · Law · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity

  • Memories of the Maimed’

    Open Access•Mark Stoyle•History•2003

  • King of the Sea’

    Open Access•Sean Kelsey•History•2007

  • The House of Experiment in Seventeenth-Century England

    Steven Shapin•Isis•1988

  • English Law, Irish Trials and Cromwellian State Building in the 1650s

    J Wells, John M Wells•Past & Present•2015

  • A Social History of Truth

    Steven Shapin•A Social History of Truth•1994

  • Leviathan and the Air-Pump

    Steven Shapin, Simon Schaffer•Leviathan and the Air-Pump•2011

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae