How do you feel? Preverbal infants match negative emotions to events
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9789707 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Ashley L Ruba (0000-0001-6213-6868, autor correspondente), Andrew N Meltzoff (0000-0001-8683-0547), Betty M Repacholi |
| Ano | 2019 |
| Volume | 55 |
| Fascículo | 6 |
| Páginas | 1138-1149 |
| Data de publicação | 2019-06-01 |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Developmental Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0012-1649 • E-ISSN: 1939-0599 |
| Editora | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037/dev0000711 |
| PMID | 30829508 |
| OpenAlex | W2920064479 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 16 |
| Referências citadas | 6 |
There is extensive disagreement as to whether preverbal infants have conceptual categories for different emotions (e.g., anger vs. disgust). In addition, few studies have examined whether infants have conceptual categories of emotions within the same dimension of valence and arousal (e.g., high arousal, negative emotions). The current experiments explore one aspect of infants' ability to form conceptual categories of emotions: event-emotion matching. Three experiments investigated whether infants match different negative emotions to specific events. In Experiment 1, 14- and 18-month-olds were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 negative emotion conditions (Anger, Fear, or Disgust). Infants were familiarized with an Emoter interacting with objects in an anger-eliciting event (Unmet Goal) and a disgust-eliciting event (New Food). After each event, the Emoter expressed an emotion that was either congruent or incongruent with the event. Infants matched unmet goals to the expression of anger. However, neither age matched the expression of disgust to an event involving exposure to new food. To probe whether this was a design artifact, a revised New Food event and a fear-congruent event (Strange Toy) were created for Experiment 2. Infants matched the expression of disgust to the new food event, but they did not match fear to an event involving an unfamiliar object. Experiment 3 replicated the disgust findings from Experiment 2 in a sample of 14-month-olds. However, the anger findings from Experiment 1 did not replicate. Taken together, these results suggest that preverbal infants are beginning to form specific matches between some negative emotional expressions and events. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)
Anger · Arousal · Cognitive psychology · Developmental psychology · Disgust · Event (particle physics · Facial expression · Sadness · Valence (chemistry · Child and Animal Learning Development · Communication · Infant Health and Development · Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior · Psychology · Social Psychology
Statistical Learning in an Emotional World
Differentiation and Language Acquisition in Children’s Understanding of Emotion
Children’s Reasoning About Empathy and Social Relationships
Dangerous Ground
Beyond Language in Infant Emotion Concept Development
The unity of sense and mind
Mindfulness Courses Training Promotes Preschool Children’s Ability to Recognize Facial Expressions of Emotion
Sistemas dinámicos en psicología
Violations of social expectations enhance infants' learning
Preschool-Aged Children Jointly Consider Others’ Emotional Expressions and Prior Knowledge to Decide When to Explore
Decoding the intent-to-outcome developmental shift in moral judgment, from infancy to preschool age
Linguistic and developmental influences on superordinate facial configuration categorization in infancy
Superordinate categorization of negative facial expressions in infancy
Children’s perception of facial expressions
Progress in understanding the emergence of human emotion
Expectations about plant edibility in 6-month-old infants
Language as context for the perception of emotion
Object permanence in five-month-old infants
Constructing emotion categorization
Developmental changes in infants’ categorization of anger and disgust facial expressions
Children’s response to adult disgust elicitors
Statistical treatment of looking-time data
| Citações por ano | 2,29 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Altamente citado | Não |