The Responsibility to Protect
From promise to practice
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9926366 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jess Gifkins (0000-0003-0551-787X, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2019 |
| Volume | 95 |
| Fascículo | 5 |
| Páginas | 1165-1166 |
| Data de publicação | 2019-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346 |
| Editora | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ia/iiz162 |
| OpenAlex | W2971708456 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 16 |
Drawing on their combined 25 years of experience with the Responsibility to Protect (R2P), Alex Bellamy and Edward Luck ask the critical question: how do we move closer to implementing R2P? The two authors are uniquely positioned to reflect on both the history and practice of R2P: Bellamy is the founding director of the Asia–Pacific Centre on R2P and Luck was the United Nations' first special adviser on R2P. The book is essential reading for those who want to better understand the current state of R2P implementation and the ongoing gaps and challenges. The breadth and depth of the book are impressive, drawing on the authors' wealth of research and policy experience within think-tanks, the UN and academia more broadly. The authors begin by retelling the history of R2P––a story that has been told many times before. However, they revisit this narrative from a distance of some years and as individuals with close proximity to events as they unfolded and thus are able to tell a new version of R2P's evolution. Their historical analysis focuses on how the original mandate of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty led to an initial emphasis on questions of humanitarian intervention, as opposed to the prevention of mass atrocities. The dominance of debates on humanitarian intervention, they argue, has made R2P too UN-focused, when the most fundamental prevention activities are carried out by states. By moving beyond the UN forums, they stress the importance not only of local, regional and international actors, but also of the collaboration between them
Commission · Dominance (genetics · Humanitarian intervention · International law · Intervention (counseling · Luck · Mandate · Political science · Responsibility to Protect · Sociology · Sovereignty · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Development and Aid · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security · Psychology
China, the un, and Human Protection
Great illusions or great transformations? Human rights and international relations a hundred years on
Never Again? Mass Atrocity Early Warning Practices in the UN Secretariat
Norm Robustness and the Responsibility to Protect
Why the United Nations Underperforms at Preventing Mass Atrocities
The Responsibility to Protect
Responsible Veto Restraint
Technology, R2P, and the UN Framework of Analysis for Atrocity Crimes
Recovering African contestation and innovation in global politics
An international responsibility to develop in order to protect? A responsibility too far
The permanency of mass atrocities
Informal Practices and the Future of Mass Atrocity Prevention
The Evolution of Mass Atrocity Early Warning in the UN Secretariat
Where to Protect? Prioritization and the Responsibility to Protect
Could a United Nations Code of Conduct Help Curb Atrocities? A Response to Bolarinwa Adediran
Operationalizing Human Security
| Obras citantes distintas | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2018 - 2025 (8) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 16 |