Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

The Chagos Marine Protected Area Arbitration

Expansion of the Jurisdiction of Unclos Part Xv Courts and Tribunals

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9934563
AutoresStefan Talmon (Living Streets, autor correspondente)
Ano2016
Volume65
Fascículo4
Páginas927-951
Data de publicação2016-10-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoInternational and Comparative Law Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0020-5893 • E-ISSN: 1471-6895
EditoraCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0020589316000403
OpenAlexW2532270319
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas2
Referências citadas10

This article shows that the Tribunal in the Chagos Marine Protected Area Arbitration between Mauritius and the United Kingdom has contributed considerably to the creeping expansion of compulsory jurisdiction of courts and tribunals established under Part XV of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The Tribunal has employed three techniques to do so. First, it has read down the jurisdictional precondition to exchange views in Article 283(1) of the UNCLOS; second, it has expanded the limited scope of compulsory subject-matter jurisdiction under section 2 of Part XV by broadening the meaning of the phrase ‘any dispute concerning the interpretation or application of this Convention’ to include incidental, related—and through the backdoor of a balancing exercise—even extraneous disputes; and, third, it has restricted the limitations and exceptions to compulsory jurisdiction in Articles 297 and 298 of the UNCLOS. Few would have predicted in 1982 that a Part XV court or tribunal would—within the context of such a balancing exercise—ever find that a colonial era undertaking created binding legal obligations under international law and that the United Kingdom was obliged to return the Chagos Archipelago to Mauritius when no longer needed for defence purposes. The Tribunal's expansive reading of the jurisdictional provisions in Part XV opens up the possibility of future rulings, albeit incidentally, on issues that have little to do with the law of the sea

Arbitration · Context (archaeology · Geography · International law · Jurisdiction · Law of the sea · Political science · Public international law · Tribunal · United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea · International Law and Human Rights · International Maritime Law Issues · Law · Maritime Security and History

  • Rethinking UNCLOS dispute mechanisms

    Open Access•Syful Islam, Asm Mahmudul Hasan•International Environmental…•2025

  • The Extent and Legitimacy of the Judicial Function in Unclos Dispute Settlement

    Open Access•Douglas Guilfoyle, Joanna Mossop•International and Comparative Law…•2024

  • The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea

    Donald Rothwell, Alex Oude Elferink et al.•Oxford Handbook of the Law of the…•2015

  • Dispute Settlement Prospects in the Law of the Sea

    Open Access•Shigeru Oda•International and Comparative Law…•1995

  • Dispute Settlement and the Law of the Sea Convention

    Open Access•Alan E Boyle•International and Comparative Law…•1997

  • The Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea

    Open Access•Bernard H Oxman•American Journal of International…•1981

  • In re Chagos Marine Protected Area (Mauritius v. United Kingdom)

    Open Access•David A Colson, Brian J Vohrer•American Journal of International…•2015

Obras citantes distintas2
Citações por ano1
Intervalo de citações2024 - 2025 (2)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae