Cooperation, Fair Play, and the Non-Struggle Point
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9949377 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Samuel Kahn (0000-0001-6597-7646, Indiana University Indianapolis, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 64 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 431-443 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Dialogue (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0012-2173 • E-ISSN: 1759-0949 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0012217325100760 |
| OpenAlex | W7117536016 |
| Idioma | EN |
In Julia Maskivker’s recent “Justice and Contribution,” she argues that, under normal circumstances, the failure to guarantee that life-sustaining workers are above the non-struggle point is not merely disrespectful and a failure of beneficence, but a violation of the norms of fair play and, as such, a “low blow.” In this article, I offer a critical reply to Maskivker. I begin by explaining her reasoning. Then I turn to critique, focusing on two key weaknesses and, in so doing, drawing out two larger lessons
Calculus (dental · Key (lock · Point (geometry · Strengths and weaknesses · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Political Philosophy and Ethics
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |