Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Journal of Business and Psychology

Dados do Periódico

TipoJOURNAL
EditoraKluwer Academic/Human Sciences Press Inc. (US)
ISSN0889-3268 / 1573-353X
Scopus15392
WikidataQ15716298
OpenAlexS61413993
MAG61413993
Sitehttp://www.springer.com/journal/10869/about
Total de publicações30
Período coberto1991 - 2022
PaísUS
IdiomaEN
IndexaçãoScopus
Fator de impacto20.75
SJR2.563 (Q1)
SNIP2.514
CiteScore10.6
Citações em políticas (Overton)2
Participação feminina na autoria45.0%

This journal focuses on business and organizational psychology, an applied field within psychology. While psychological anthropology is a subfield, this venue's specific focus on business contexts and applied psychology has only a loose and occasional intersection with social anthropology's core ethnographic and theoretical concerns

Applied Psychology · Business and International Management · Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous) · Psychology (miscellaneous) · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Business, Management and Accounting (all · Conflict Management and Negotiation

  • Normalizing the Use of Single-Item Measures

    Open Access•Russell A Matthews, Laura Pineault et al.•ARTICLE•2022

  • The Participation of People with Disabilities in the Workplace Across the Employment Cycle

    Open Access•Silvia Bonaccio, Catherine E Connelly et al.•ARTICLE•2020

    Despite legislation on diversity in the workplace, people with disabilities still do not experience the same access to work opportunities as do their counterparts without disabilities. Many employers have been shown to harbor sincere yet ill-founded views about the work-related abilities of people with disabilities; these negative views are often a result of interrelated concerns that permeate the entire employment cycle. In this paper, we provid…

  • Do Not Cross Me

    Open Access•Paul E Spector•ARTICLE•2019

  • Dirty Data

    Open Access•Justin A DeSimone, Peter D Harms•ARTICLE•2018

  • A Review of Best Practice Recommendations for Text Analysis in R (and a User-Friendly App)

    Open Access•George C Banks, Haley M Woznyj et al.•ARTICLE•2018

  • A Tale of Two Sample Sources

    Open Access•Sheryl L Walter, Sibila E Seibert et al.•ARTICLE•2018

  • Back to Basics with Mixed-Effects Models

    Open Access•Paul D Bliese, Mark A Maltarich et al.•ARTICLE•2018

  • Intra-individual Response Variability as an Indicator of Insufficient Effort Responding

    Open Access•Alexandra M Dunn, Eric D Heggestad et al.•ARTICLE•2018

  • Complementary Variable- and Person-Centered Approaches to the Dimensionality of Psychometric Constructs

    Open Access•Alexandre J S Morin, Jean-Sébastien Boudrias et al.•ARTICLE•2017

  • Amazon Mechanical Turk in Organizational Psychology

    Open Access•Janelle H Cheung, Deanna K Burns et al.•ARTICLE•2017

  • Four Research Designs and a Comprehensive Analysis Strategy for Investigating Common Method Variance with Self-Report Measures Using Latent Variables

    Open Access•Larry J Williams, Alyssa K McGonagle•ARTICLE•2016

  • RWA Web

    Open Access•Scott Tonidandel, James M Lebreton•ARTICLE•2015

  • Moderation in Management Research

    Open Access•Jeremy Dawson, Jeremy F Dawson•ARTICLE•2013

  • Generational Differences in Work-Related Attitudes

    Open Access•David P Costanza, Jessica M Badger et al.•ARTICLE•2012

  • The Servant Leadership Survey

    Open Access•Dirk Van Dierendonck, Inge Nuijten•ARTICLE•2011

    PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to describe the development and validation of a multi-dimensional instrument to measure servant leadership. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Based on an extensive literature review and expert judgment, 99 items were formulated. In three steps, using eight samples totaling 1571 persons from The Netherlands and the UK with a diverse occupational background, a combined exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis ap…

  • Detecting and Deterring Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys

    Open Access•Jason L Huang, Paul Curran et al.•ARTICLE•2011

  • The Writing on the (Facebook) Wall

    Open Access•Victoria R Brown, E Daly Vaughn•ARTICLE•2011

  • Relative Importance Analysis

    Open Access•Scott Tonidandel, James M Lebreton•ARTICLE•2011

  • Polynomial Regression with Response Surface Analysis

    Open Access•Linda Rhoades Shanock, Benjamin E Baran et al.•ARTICLE•2010

  • What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research

    Open Access•James M Conway, Charles E Lance•ARTICLE•2010

  • A Meta-Analytic Review of the Consequences Associated with Work–Family Enrichment

    Open Access•Laurel A Mcnall, Jessica M Nicklin et al.•ARTICLE•2010

  • Response Rates in Organizational Science, 1995–2008

    Open Access•Frederik Anseel, Filip Lievens et al.•ARTICLE•2010

  • Millennials in the Workplace

    Open Access•Karen Kroman Myers, Kamyab Sadaghiani•ARTICLE•2010

    Stereotypes about Millennials, born between 1979 and 1994, depict them as self-centered, unmotivated, disrespectful, and disloyal, contributing to widespread concern about how communication with Millennials will affect organizations and how they will develop relationships with other organizational members. We review these purported characteristics, as well as Millennials' more positive qualities-they work well in teams, are motivated to have an i…

  • A Review of the Empirical Evidence on Generational Differences in Work Attitudes

    Open Access•J M Twenge•ARTICLE•2010

  • New Generation, Great Expectations

    Open Access•Eddy Ng, Eddy S W Ng et al.•ARTICLE•2010

Próximo

Sem publicações proeminentes nesta página.

  • Millennials in the Workplace

    Open Access•Karen Kroman Myers, Kamyab Sadaghiani•ARTICLE•2010

    Stereotypes about Millennials, born between 1979 and 1994, depict them as self-centered, unmotivated, disrespectful, and disloyal, contributing to widespread concern about how communication with Millennials will affect organizations and how they will develop relationships with other organizational members. We review these purported characteristics, as well as Millennials' more positive qualities-they work well in teams, are motivated to have an i…

  • A Review of the Empirical Evidence on Generational Differences in Work Attitudes

    Open Access•J M Twenge•ARTICLE•2010

  • New Generation, Great Expectations

    Open Access•Eddy Ng, Eddy S W Ng et al.•ARTICLE•2010

  • What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research

    Open Access•James M Conway, Charles E Lance•ARTICLE•2010

  • A Meta-Analytic Review of the Consequences Associated with Work–Family Enrichment

    Open Access•Laurel A Mcnall, Jessica M Nicklin et al.•ARTICLE•2010

  • Response Rates in Organizational Science, 1995–2008

    Open Access•Frederik Anseel, Filip Lievens et al.•ARTICLE•2010

  • Polynomial Regression with Response Surface Analysis

    Open Access•Linda Rhoades Shanock, Benjamin E Baran et al.•ARTICLE•2010

  • Relative Importance Analysis

    Open Access•Scott Tonidandel, James M Lebreton•ARTICLE•2011

  • The Writing on the (Facebook) Wall

    Open Access•Victoria R Brown, E Daly Vaughn•ARTICLE•2011

  • Detecting and Deterring Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys

    Open Access•Jason L Huang, Paul Curran et al.•ARTICLE•2011

  • The Servant Leadership Survey

    Open Access•Dirk Van Dierendonck, Inge Nuijten•ARTICLE•2011

    PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to describe the development and validation of a multi-dimensional instrument to measure servant leadership. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Based on an extensive literature review and expert judgment, 99 items were formulated. In three steps, using eight samples totaling 1571 persons from The Netherlands and the UK with a diverse occupational background, a combined exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis ap…

  • Generational Differences in Work-Related Attitudes

    Open Access•David P Costanza, Jessica M Badger et al.•ARTICLE•2012

  • Moderation in Management Research

    Open Access•Jeremy Dawson, Jeremy F Dawson•ARTICLE•2013

  • RWA Web

    Open Access•Scott Tonidandel, James M Lebreton•ARTICLE•2015

  • Four Research Designs and a Comprehensive Analysis Strategy for Investigating Common Method Variance with Self-Report Measures Using Latent Variables

    Open Access•Larry J Williams, Alyssa K McGonagle•ARTICLE•2016

  • Complementary Variable- and Person-Centered Approaches to the Dimensionality of Psychometric Constructs

    Open Access•Alexandre J S Morin, Jean-Sébastien Boudrias et al.•ARTICLE•2017

  • Amazon Mechanical Turk in Organizational Psychology

    Open Access•Janelle H Cheung, Deanna K Burns et al.•ARTICLE•2017

  • Back to Basics with Mixed-Effects Models

    Open Access•Paul D Bliese, Mark A Maltarich et al.•ARTICLE•2018

  • Intra-individual Response Variability as an Indicator of Insufficient Effort Responding

    Open Access•Alexandra M Dunn, Eric D Heggestad et al.•ARTICLE•2018

  • A Tale of Two Sample Sources

    Open Access•Sheryl L Walter, Sibila E Seibert et al.•ARTICLE•2018

  • A Review of Best Practice Recommendations for Text Analysis in R (and a User-Friendly App)

    Open Access•George C Banks, Haley M Woznyj et al.•ARTICLE•2018

  • Dirty Data

    Open Access•Justin A DeSimone, Peter D Harms•ARTICLE•2018

  • Do Not Cross Me

    Open Access•Paul E Spector•ARTICLE•2019

  • The Participation of People with Disabilities in the Workplace Across the Employment Cycle

    Open Access•Silvia Bonaccio, Catherine E Connelly et al.•ARTICLE•2020

    Despite legislation on diversity in the workplace, people with disabilities still do not experience the same access to work opportunities as do their counterparts without disabilities. Many employers have been shown to harbor sincere yet ill-founded views about the work-related abilities of people with disabilities; these negative views are often a result of interrelated concerns that permeate the entire employment cycle. In this paper, we provid…

  • Normalizing the Use of Single-Item Measures

    Open Access•Russell A Matthews, Laura Pineault et al.•ARTICLE•2022

Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae