Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Games and Economic Behavior

Journal Data

TypeJOURNAL
PublisherAcademic Press Inc (US)
ISSN0899-8256 / 1090-2473
Scopus14194
WikidataQ5520105
OpenAlexS94044085
MAG94044085
Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622836/description#description
Total publications88
Coverage period1989 - 2025
CountryUS
LanguageEN
IndexingScopus indexed
Impact factor0.906
SJR1.11 (Q1)
SNIP1.176
CiteScore2.2
Overton policy citations1
Female authorship share20.1%

This journal focuses on game theory and economic behavior, primarily from a quantitative and theoretical economics perspective. While it studies human behavior, its approach is distinct from the qualitative and interpretive methods of social anthropology

Economics and Econometrics · Finance · Auction Theory and Applications · Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing · Culture, Economy, and Development Studies · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Digital Platforms and Economics · Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies

  • Dual communication in a social network: Contributing and dedicating attention

    Open Access•Gabrielle Demange•ARTICLE•2025

  • Endogenous barriers to learning

    Open Access•Olivier Compte•ARTICLE•2025

  • Quantal response equilibrium with a continuum of types: Characterization and nonparametric identification

    Open Access•Evan Friedman, Duarte Gonçalves•ARTICLE•2025

  • Voter coordination in elections: A case for approval voting

    Open Access•François Durand, Antonin Macé et al.•ARTICLE•2024

    We study how voting rules shape voter coordination in large three-candidate elections. We consider three rules, that differ on the number of candidates that voters can support: Plurality (one), Anti-Plurality (two) and Approval Voting (one or two). We show that the Condorcet winner is always elected at some equilibrium under Approval Voting, and that this rule provides better welfare guarantees than Plurality. We then numerically study a dynamic …

  • Oddness of the number of Nash equilibria: The case of polynomial payoff functions

    Open Access•Philippe Bich, Julien Fixary•ARTICLE•2024

  • Simple relational contracts and the dynamics of social capital

    Open Access•Mathieu V Leduc•ARTICLE•2024

  • Competing for Influence in Networks Through Strategic Targeting

    Open Access•Margherita Comola, Agnieszka Rusinowska et al.•ARTICLE•2024

    We experimentally investigate how players with opposing views compete for influence through strategic targeting in networks. We varied the network structure, the relative influence of the opponent, and the heterogeneity of the nodes’initial opinions. Although most players adopted a best-response strategy based on their relative influence, we also observed behaviors deviating from this strategy, such as the tendency to target central nodes and avo…

  • Revealed deliberate preference change

    Open Access•Niels Boissonnet, Alexis Ghersengorin et al.•ARTICLE•2023

  • An analytically solvable principal-agent model

    Open Access•Lars‐Göran Mattsson, Jörgen W Weibull•ARTICLE•2023

    We analyze a principal-agent model with moral hazard where the principal is risk neutral while the agent is risk averse or risk neutral. The agent is free to choose any probability distribution over outcomes, where some distributions require more effort than others. The agent's effort-cost function is of “Legendre type” and satisfies an axiom of invariance under mergers of outcomes that are equally paid by the principal. We analyze a family of su…

  • Dynamic consistency in incomplete information games with multiple priors

    Open Access•Marieke Pahlke•ARTICLE•2022

  • Myopic and farsighted stable sets in 2-player strategic-form games

    Open Access•Francis Bloch, Anne Van Den Nouweland•ARTICLE•2021

  • Multi-state choices with aggregate feedback on unfamiliar alternatives

    Open Access•Philippe Jehiel, Juni Singh•ARTICLE•2021

    This paper studies a multi-state binary choice experiment in which in each state, one alternative has well understood consequences whereas the other alternative has unknown consequences. Subjects repeatedly receive feedback from past choices about the consequences of unfamiliar alternatives but this feedback is aggregated over states. Varying the payoffs attached to the various alternatives in various states allows us to test whether unfamiliar a…

  • Cognitively-constrained learning from neighbors

    Open Access•Wei Li, Xu Tan•ARTICLE•2021

  • An experiment on network density and sequential learning

    Open Access•Krishna Dasaratha, Kevin He•ARTICLE•2021

  • The value of network information: Assortative mixing makes the difference

    Open Access•Mohamed Belhaj, Frédéric Deroı̈an et al.•ARTICLE•2021

  • Cheap talk with coarse understanding

    Open Access•Jeanne Hagenbach, Frédéric Koessler•ARTICLE•2020

  • Farsighted stability with heterogeneous expectations

    Open Access•Francis Bloch, Anne Van Den Nouweland•ARTICLE•2020

  • Matching through institutions

    Open Access•Francis Bloch, David Cantalá et al.•ARTICLE•2020

  • Diffusion of multiple information: On information resilience and the power of segregation

    Open Access•Nicole Tabasso•ARTICLE•2019

  • Group targeting under networked synergies

    Open Access•Mohamed Belhaj, Frédéric Deroı̈an et al.•ARTICLE•2019

  • On endogenous formation of price expectations

    Open Access•Cuong Le Van, Paulina Navrouzoglou et al.•ARTICLE•2019

  • On the hardness of designing public signals

    Open Access•Shaddin Dughmi•ARTICLE•2018

  • Information diffusion in networks with the Bayesian Peer Influence heuristic

    Open Access•Gilat Levy, Ronny Razin•ARTICLE•2018

  • Propaganda and credulity

    Open Access•Andrew T Little•ARTICLE•2017

  • Incentives and cheating

    Open Access•Agne Kajackaite, Uri Gneezy•ARTICLE•2017

Next

No prominent publications on this page.

  • Potential Games

    Open Access•Dov Monderer, Lloyd S Shapley•ARTICLE•1996

  • Repeated Large Games with Incomplete Information

    Open Access•E Lehrer, Rann Smorodinsky•ARTICLE•1997

  • Pure Strategy Nash Equilibrium in a Group Formation Game with Positive Externalities

    Open Access•Hideo Konishi, Michel Le Breton et al.•ARTICLE•1997

  • Linear Inequality Methods to Enforce Partnerships under Uncertainty: An Overview

    Open Access•Claude D’aspremont, Claude D'Aspremont et al.•ARTICLE•1998

  • Efficient Private Production of Public Goods under Common Agency

    Open Access•Didier Laussel, Michel Le Breton•ARTICLE•1998

  • Economic Dynasties with Intermissions

    Open Access•Louis Gevers, Philippe Michel•ARTICLE•1998

  • A Value with Incomplete Communication

    Open Access•Gérard Hamiache•ARTICLE•1999

  • Bayesian learning in social networks

    Open Access•Douglas Gale, Shachar Kariv•ARTICLE•2003

  • How to identify trust and reciprocity

    Open Access•James C Cox•ARTICLE•2004

  • A theory of sequential reciprocity

    Open Access•Martin Dufwenberg, Georg Kirchsteiger•ARTICLE•2004

  • The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision

    Open Access•Antoine Bechara, Antonio R Damasio•ARTICLE•2005

  • A theory of reciprocity

    Open Access•Aliya Falk, Urs Fischbacher•ARTICLE•2006

  • An experimental study of storable votes

    Open Access•Alessandra Casella, Andrew Gelman et al.•ARTICLE•2006

  • In Search of Stars: Network Formation among Heterogeneous Agents

    Open Access•Jacob K Goeree, Arno Riedl et al.•ARTICLE•2007

  • Trust and trustworthiness across different age groups

    Open Access•Matthias Sutter, Martin G Kocher•ARTICLE•2007

  • Revisiting games of incomplete information with analogy-based expectations

    Open Access•Philippe Jehiel, Frédéric Koessler•ARTICLE•2007

  • Comparative statics in a simple class of strategic market games

    Open Access•Rabah Amir, Francis Bloch•ARTICLE•2007

  • The strategy structure of some coalition formation games

    Open Access•Gabrielle Demange•ARTICLE•2007

  • Testing theories of fairness—Intentions matter

    Open Access•Aliya Falk, Ernst Fehr et al.•ARTICLE•2008

  • David in Paris

    Open Access•Gabrielle Demange•ARTICLE•2009

  • Sharing information in Web communities

    Open Access•Gabrielle Demange•ARTICLE•2009

  • Elections with platform and valence competition

    Open Access•Scott Ashworth, Ethan Bueno De Mesquita•ARTICLE•2009

  • Ability and knowledge

    Open Access•Olivier Gossner•ARTICLE•2009

  • Feedback spillover and analogy-based expectations: A multi-game experiment

    Open Access•Steffen Huck, Philippe Jehiel et al.•ARTICLE•2010

  • Agenda control as a cheap talk game: Theory and experiments with Storable Votes

    Open Access•Alessandra Casella•ARTICLE•2010

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae