The United Nations Security Council and war
Journal Data
| Type | SOURCE_BOOK |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (GB) |
| ISBN-13 | 9780199533435 |
| Open Library | OL16950543W |
| Total publications | 2 |
| Coverage period | 2008 - 2008 |
| Language | EN |
This text brings together leading scholars and practitioners to provide an analysis of the legal, historical, and political context in which the Security Council operates. They explore the different functions that the Council has acquired over the last 60 years, partly in response to the changing nature of war.
The United Nations Security Council and war
This text brings together leading scholars and practitioners to provide an analysis of the legal, historical, and political context in which the Security Council operates. They explore the different functions that the Council has acquired over the last 60 years, partly in response to the changing nature of war.
The Security Council And The Great Powers
International institutions and great powers often coexist in an ambivalent relationship. From the perspective of powerful states, institutions tend to appear as unwelcome constraints, as a ‘strategy of the weak’ intended to tie them down. For weak states, international institutions often represent precisely the opposite: tools of the powerful that are intended to conceal or even legitimate dominance. In a different form, these two perspectives ar…
No prominent publications on this page.
The United Nations Security Council and war
This text brings together leading scholars and practitioners to provide an analysis of the legal, historical, and political context in which the Security Council operates. They explore the different functions that the Council has acquired over the last 60 years, partly in response to the changing nature of war.
The Security Council And The Great Powers
International institutions and great powers often coexist in an ambivalent relationship. From the perspective of powerful states, institutions tend to appear as unwelcome constraints, as a ‘strategy of the weak’ intended to tie them down. For weak states, international institutions often represent precisely the opposite: tools of the powerful that are intended to conceal or even legitimate dominance. In a different form, these two perspectives ar…