American Tragedy
Kennedy, Johnson, and the Origins of the Vietnam War
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 10031379 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Sayuri Shimizu (0000-0003-0661-1171, Michigan State University, autor de correspondencia), David Kaiser (0000-0002-5054-6744), Robert S Mcnamara (0009-0002-7143-2225), James G Blight, Robert K Brigham, Thomas J Biersteker (0000-0001-8176-0914), Herbert Y Schandler |
| Año | 2001 |
| Volumen | 88 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 1163-1163 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2001-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of American History (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0021-8723 • E-ISSN: 1945-2314 |
| Editorial | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2700540 |
| OpenAlex | W2278310444 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 10 |
It sounds like a cliché, but it is true: democracy, to fulfill its promise as the best of human traditions, requires enlightened leadership. According to David Kaiser, the generation of Americans who came of age in the turbulent 1930s and 1940s felt blessed in that regard. By shepherding the battered national economy out of the Great Depression and leading the Grand Alliance to resounding victory over fascism, the government in Washington had proven itself capable of solving the world's most daunting problems and so demonstrated the supremacy of American institutions. Almost anything appeared manag eable, if not achievable. Members of the “GI generation,” an analytical category Kaiser effectively, if inconsistently, employs in his recent study of the Vietnam War, had reason to believe in their government. They had learned that their leaders could parlay benevolent intentions into beneficial action. Their institutions, they thought, were effective mechanisms for recruiting men, if not women, capable of making right and just decisions. How, then, could those leaders, in the name of freedom and democracy, have made the grossly wrong choices that launched the nation into the tragic war in Vietnam? American Tragedy and Argument without End are important additions to the evergrowing literature seeking to provide clues toward an answer to this haunting question
Alliance · Argument (complex analysis · Democracy · Government (linguistics · Great Depression · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Tragedy (event · Victory · Vietnam War · American Political and Social Dynamics · History · Law · Medicine · Philosophy · Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
A geopolitical discourse with Robert McNamara
Militias in internal warfare
Institutionalizing supreme command
‘I Made Mistakes’
The Cambridge Companion to John F. Kennedy
Black radical masculinities in American warfare
The limits of peacemaking
The Ideological Debate in the DRV and the Significance of the Anti-Party Affair, 1967–68
Lesson number one
Victory in scholarship on strategy and war
| Obras citantes distintas | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,38 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2000 - 2019 (20) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 7 |