Abraham Lincoln and the Forge of National Memory

Bibliographic Data

ID10035916
AuthorsJim Cullen (Sarah Lawrence College, corresponding author), Barry Schwartz (0000-0001-6947-9871)
Year2001
Volume88
Issue3
Pages1086
Publication date2001-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of American History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-8723 • E-ISSN: 1945-2314
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2700455
OpenAlexW2465218974
LanguageEN
Citations received24

You mig ht say that if Abraham Lincoln had not existed, historians of memory would have invented him. Fortunately, according to Barry Schwartz, Lincoln did exist, and while generations of Americans have repeatedly remade him in their own image, this is less because Lincoln's reputation is an endlessly pliable social construction than because the essence of the man has made him available for many legitimate uses. In this, the first of two planned volumes, Schwartz traces some of these uses from the assassination to the dedication of the Lincoln Memorial. Schwartz, a sociologist who has written a number of works about the commemoration of historical figures, has an avowedly revisionist agenda. In the theoretically elaborate introduction of the book, he challenges what he calls the dominant “politics of memory school”—typified by John Bodnar's Remaking America (1992)— because of what Schwartz considers an excessive emphasis on the way conservative elites manipulate history as a means of social control. He also calls for a fuller approach toward understanding the dynamics of memory; in contrast to Merrill Pet erson's Lincoln in American Memory (1994), which focuses on the “what” of Lincoln's reputation, Schwartz takes a more sociological approach, emphasizing the “how” and “why.”

Collective memory · Forge · Political science · Politics · Reputation · Social science · Sociology · History · Law · Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration · Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub