The London ‘Insurrection’ of December 1792
Fact, Fiction, or Fantasy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10063428 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Clive Emsley (The Open University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1978 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 66-86 |
| Publication date | 1978-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of British Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0021-9371 • E-ISSN: 1545-6986 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1086/385722 |
| OpenAlex | W2155780598 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 12 |
As the likelihood of war with revolutionary France grew at the end of 1792 and beginning of 1793, the pro-government press in England reported that a serious plan for an insurrection, scheduled for the first weekend in December 1792, had been nipped in the bud by the authorities. On December 3 The Times stated that, as it had not wished to create alarm, it had not previously mentioned the full facts of the seditious attempts being made in the country. These attempts, the newspaper maintained, had prompted almost daily meetings of the Cabinet climaxing in a meeting at Lord Grenville's house which had lasted until one a.m. on the preceding Saturday morning (December 1). It was from this meeting that the Cabinet had issued the royal proclamation which embodied part of the militia and which deplored the ineffectiveness of the May 1792 proclamation against seditious meetings and writings. Three weeks later, beneath the headline “Revolution Plans,” the World reported that two parties were involved in the projected insurrection: the “moderates” who sought first the destruction of the House of Lords, the Herald's Office, and the Horse Guards, and then the enlarging of the Commons; and those whose plans were “more extensive” and who would have gone on to destroy St. James's Palace, the Bank, the law courts, the prisons, the customs house, and excise office. A month later, under the headline “Project of an Insurrection,” the London Chronicle gave similar details of a plot “to overturn the government and the constitution of this country.”
Advertising · Ancient history · Archaeology · Cabinet (room · Constitution · Economic history · Headline · House of Commons · Interregnum · Martial law · Newspaper · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Proclamation · Sedition · American Constitutional Law and Politics · History · Law
Alarmism, Public-Sphere Performatives, and the Lyric Turn
The Cambridge Social History of Britain, 1750-1950
The European idea and Britain 1688–1815
The Dublin Society of United Irishmen and the politics of the Carey–Drennan dispute, 1792–1794
William Winterbotham's Trumpet of Sedition
William Pitt and the origins of the Loyalist Association Movement of 1792
Between Scylla and Charybdis
Making of the English Working Class
The Town Labourer and the Industrial Revolution
The French Revolution in English History
The Whig Party and the French Revolution
Some Labour Troubles of the 1790's in North East England
Sheffield and the English Revolutionary Tradition, 1791–1820
III. The Association Movement of 1792–3
Patrician Society, Plebeian Culture
Political Disaffection and the British Army in 1792
The Town Labourer and the Industrial Revolution
The Early English Trade Unions
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1991 - 2021 (31) |
| Highly cited | No |