Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The London ‘Insurrection’ of December 1792

Fact, Fiction, or Fantasy

Bibliographic Data

ID10063428
AuthorsClive Emsley (The Open University, corresponding author)
Year1978
Volume17
Issue2
Pages66-86
Publication date1978-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of British Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-9371 • E-ISSN: 1545-6986
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1086/385722
OpenAlexW2155780598
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited12

As the likelihood of war with revolutionary France grew at the end of 1792 and beginning of 1793, the pro-government press in England reported that a serious plan for an insurrection, scheduled for the first weekend in December 1792, had been nipped in the bud by the authorities. On December 3 The Times stated that, as it had not wished to create alarm, it had not previously mentioned the full facts of the seditious attempts being made in the country. These attempts, the newspaper maintained, had prompted almost daily meetings of the Cabinet climaxing in a meeting at Lord Grenville's house which had lasted until one a.m. on the preceding Saturday morning (December 1). It was from this meeting that the Cabinet had issued the royal proclamation which embodied part of the militia and which deplored the ineffectiveness of the May 1792 proclamation against seditious meetings and writings. Three weeks later, beneath the headline “Revolution Plans,” the World reported that two parties were involved in the projected insurrection: the “moderates” who sought first the destruction of the House of Lords, the Herald's Office, and the Horse Guards, and then the enlarging of the Commons; and those whose plans were “more extensive” and who would have gone on to destroy St. James's Palace, the Bank, the law courts, the prisons, the customs house, and excise office. A month later, under the headline “Project of an Insurrection,” the London Chronicle gave similar details of a plot “to overturn the government and the constitution of this country.”

Advertising · Ancient history · Archaeology · Cabinet (room · Constitution · Economic history · Headline · House of Commons · Interregnum · Martial law · Newspaper · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Proclamation · Sedition · American Constitutional Law and Politics · History · Law

  • Alarmism, Public-Sphere Performatives, and the Lyric Turn

    Mark Jones•boundary 2•2003

  • The Cambridge Social History of Britain, 1750-1950

    Gareth Stedman Jones•The Economic History Review•1991

  • The European idea and Britain 1688–1815

    Jeremy Black•History of European Ideas•1993

  • The Dublin Society of United Irishmen and the politics of the Carey–Drennan dispute, 1792–1794

    Open Access•Michael Durey•The Historical Journal•1994

  • William Winterbotham's Trumpet of Sedition

    Open Access•Michael Durey•Journal of Religious History•1995

  • William Pitt and the origins of the Loyalist Association Movement of 1792

    Open Access•Michael Duffy•The Historical Journal•1996

  • Between Scylla and Charybdis

    Mathieu Ferradou•French Historical Studies•2021

  • Making of the English Working Class

    E P Thompson•Making of the English Working Class•2013

  • The Town Labourer and the Industrial Revolution

    John W Osborne, Malcolm I Thomis•The American Historical Review•1976

  • The French Revolution in English History

    Philip Anthony Brown•French Revolution in English…•2018

  • The Whig Party and the French Revolution

    Caroline Robbins, F O'Gorman•The American Historical Review•1969

  • Some Labour Troubles of the 1790's in North East England

    Open Access•Norman Mccord, David E Brewster•International Review of Social…•1968

  • Sheffield and the English Revolutionary Tradition, 1791–1820

    Open Access•F K Donnelly, Faye Donnelly et al.•International Review of Social…•1975

  • III. The Association Movement of 1792–3

    Open Access•Austin Mitchell•The Historical Journal•1961

  • Patrician Society, Plebeian Culture

    Edward P Thompson•Journal of Social History•1974

  • Political Disaffection and the British Army in 1792

    Open Access•Clive Emsley•Historical Research•1975

  • The Town Labourer and the Industrial Revolution

    E H Hunt, Malcolm I Thomis•The Economic History Review•1975

  • The Early English Trade Unions

    James B Jefferys, Arthur Aspinall•The Economic History Review•1949

Citations per year0.2
Citation span1991 - 2021 (31)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae