Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The “Marriage with a Deceased Wife's Sister Bill” Controversy

Incest Anxiety and the Defense of Family Purity in Victorian England

Bibliographic Data

ID10064075
AuthorsNancy Fix Anderson (University of New Orleans, corresponding author)
Year1982
Volume21
Issue2
Pages67-86
Publication date1982-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of British Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-9371 • E-ISSN: 1545-6986
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1086/385790
PMID11632237
OpenAlexW2148259437
LanguageEN
Citations received15
References cited4

In 1835 the English Lord Chancellor Lyndhurst introduced into the House of Lords a bill to correct an ambiguity in the law concerning marriages within prohibited degrees. The existing law, based on the 1533 Henrican statute fixing the degrees of consanguinity and affinity, specified that marriages within prohibited degrees could be annulled at any time within the lifetime of both spouses by the Ecclesiastical Court. Lord Lyndhurst argued that the uncertain status of such “voidable marriages” created an inconvenience and hardship for the married persons and especially for their children, who could during their parents' lifetime be declared illegitimate. His specific motive was to guarantee the legitimacy and inheritance of the son of the seventh Duke of Beaufort, who had married his deceased wife's half-sister, a relationship within the prohibited degrees. Lyndhurst proposed that parliament pass a bill to limit to two years the time within which marriages could be annulled. The consensus in parliament was that the ambiguity of “voidable marriages” should be eliminated, and they readily passed a revised form of Lord Lyndhurst's bill, declaring that all marriages within the prohibited degrees of affinity contracted before August 31, 1835 were immediately and absolutely valid. Yet, even as they eased restrictions on existing marriages, they tightened the law for the future by adding a clause which made marriages of both affinity and consanguinity contracted after that date absolutely void. In the parliamentary debate on the bill, there was some opposition from those who argued that marriages within certain degrees of affinity, in particular a man and his deceased wife's sister, should be permitted

Appeal · Genealogy · Marriage law · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Sister · Sociology · Statute · Wife · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · History · Law · Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies

  • Eve and Evolution

    Diarmid A Finnegan•Journal of the History of Ideas•2014

  • Traditional Ambivalence and Heterosexual Marriage in Canada

    Pauline Greenhill, Angela Armstrong et al.•Ethnologies•2007

  • Histoire de la parenté ou anthropologie historique de la parenté ? Autour de Kinship in Europe

    François-Joseph Ruggiu•Annales de Démographie Historique•2010

  • Households and ‘hidden’ kin in early-nineteenth-century England

    Open Access•Di Cooper, Moira Donald•Continuity and Change•1995

  • Soul-mates

    McAleavey McAleavey•Victorian Studies•2010

  • Introduction

    Open Access•Brian Lewis•Journal of British Studies•2012

  • Identity and Imperial/Cinematic Gazing in Morag Murray Abdullah's My Khyber Marriage

    Terri A Hasseler•NWSA Journal•2000

  • The comfort of strangers

    Stephen A Webb•European Journal of Social Work•2007

  • The comfort of strangers

    Stephen A Webb•European Journal of Social Work•2007

  • Widowers and their sisters-in-law

    Margareth Lanzinger•The History of the Family•2016

  • Husband, Wife, and Sister

    Open Access•Mary Jean Corbett•Victorian Literature and Culture•2007

  • Sister-in-Law Marriage in the Empire

    Charlotte Frew•The Journal of Imperial &…•2013

  • Literacy and State–Society Interactions in Nineteenth‐Century France

    Open Access•Nan Zhang, Marshall M Lee et al.•American Journal of Political…•2020

  • Cousin Marriage in Victorian England

    Open Access•Nancy Fix Anderson•Journal of Family History•1986

  • Scrambling parenthood

    Open Access•Bob Simpson•Anthropology Today•2006

  • The family, sex and marriage in England, 1500-1800

    Lawrence Stone•The family, sex and marriage in…•1979

  • Macaulay. The Shaping of the Historian

    G Kitson Clark, John Clive•History and Theory•1974

Unique citing works15
Citations per year0,38
Citation span1986 - 2020 (35)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 14

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae