Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Party, Purpose, and Pattern

Sir Lewis Namier and His Critics

Bibliographic Data

ID10064765
AuthorsJacob M Price (corresponding author)
Year1961
Volume1
Issue1
Pages71-93
Publication date1961-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of British Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-9371 • E-ISSN: 1545-6986
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1086/385436
OpenAlexW2092059365
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited10

The recent death of Professor Sir Lewis Namier (19 August 1960) provides an occasion to assess, albeit most tentatively, if not the man (I did not know him well), then at least his contribution to the writing of English history. The need for such an assessment is a little ironic, for Sir Lewis, for all his renown, has left a somewhat indistinct after-image among historians in this country. Ever since the appearance in 1929 of his great work on the Structure of Politics at the Accession of George III , his name has been a fixture in bibliographies and in the knowingness of knowing graduate student and cannier undergraduate. Yet few in this country have read his work through – that is, his monumental works on eighteenth century politics on which most of the estime of his succès d'estime has been built. Many more are familiar with the lectures, reviews and critical works on modern German and diplomatic history to which he devoted much of his productive effort between 1933 and 1953. Though these last are works of some importance, the ultimate reputation of Namier as a scholar must rest on his eighteenth century work — in fact upon his publications of 1929 and 1930. It is this work and some of the methodological questions it raises which are under discussion here

Accession · Art · Art history · German · Literature · Political science · Politics · Reputation · Classics · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History · Law · Scottish History and National Identity

  • Parties, Connections, and Parliamentary Politics, 1689-1714

    Open Access•Henry Horwitz•Journal of British Studies•1966

  • Sir Lewis Namier Considered” Considered

    Open Access•Robert Walcott•Journal of British Studies•1964

  • The role of moral idealism in social change

    Patricia L Schmidt, Patricia Schmidt•Quarterly Journal of Speech•1977

  • The study of British politics between the revolution and the reform act

    W R Fryer•Renaissance and Modern Studies•1957

  • The East India Company in Eighteenth-Century Politics

    Arthur H Basye, Lucy S Sutherland•The American Historical Review•1953

  • An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States

    Charles A Beard•Bulletin of the American…•1913

  • Members of the Long Parliament

    Philip W Buck, Deborah Brunton et al.•The Western Political Quarterly•1955

  • We the People

    Thaddeus W Tate, Forrest Mcdonald•The William and Mary Quarterly•1959

  • Members of the Long Parliament

    Gerald E Aylmer, Deborah Brunton et al.•The William and Mary Quarterly•1954

  • The East India Company in Eighteenth-Century Politics

    L S Sutherland•The Economic History Review•1947

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,05
Citation span1964 - 1977 (14)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae