Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

St. John Brodrick and Army Reform, 1901–1903

Bibliographic Data

ID10064786
AuthorsLowell J Satre (Youngstown State University, corresponding author)
Year1976
Volume15
Issue2
Pages117-139
Publication date1976-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of British Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-9371 • E-ISSN: 1545-6986
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1086/385688
OpenAlexW2029031698
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited4

Edwardian England has become an increasingly significant period for scholarly research. One of the more carefully examined subjects is the interrelationship between politics and army reform. The debacles of the South African War forced the governments to examine England's army, and reforms emerged after 1901. Historians have concentrated on the efforts of Balfour's administration of 1902-05 and Haldane's sojourn at the War Office from 1906 to 1912; these periods witnessed the emergence of the Committee of Imperial Defence and the reorganization of the War Office, the shaping of the General Staff and the development of the British Expeditionary Force. All of these have been subjected to detailed examination — notably, the C. I. D. in recent works by Peter Fraser and Nicholas d'Ombrain, and the War Office by W. S. Hamer. There is, however, at least one gap in the historical literature on politics and army reform: St. John Brodrick's term as Secretary of State for War, 1901-03. An understanding of Brodrick's activities is necessary, since he was, of course, the first War Secretary to attempt reforms as a response to the obvious shortcomings of the army in the South African War. A careful examination will explain why he failed in many of his programs, the political consequences of these failures, and some of his more positive contributions. The breakdown of the British army in the first few months of the South African War, which began in October 1899 and ended in May 1902, shocked and dismayed both the public and the Government

Administration (probate law · Ancient history · Economic history · First world war · Political science · Politics · Spanish Civil War · State (computer science · World War II · History · Law · Military History and Strategy · Military, Security, and Education Studies · Public Administration

  • Rear Admiral Henry John May and the Royal Navy War Course 1900-1904

    Chris Madsen•The Northern Mariner / Le marin…•2022

  • Canada and "Imperial Defense"

    Richard A Preston•Canada and Imperial Defense•1967

  • Lord Salisbury and Foreign Policy

    Open Access•Bernard Semmel•Political Science Quarterly•1965

  • The End of Isolation. British Foreign Policy 1900-1907

    Gordon A Craig, George Monger•International Journal Canada s…•1965

  • Haldane of Cloan

    A F Whyte•International Affairs•1960

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,25
Citation span2022 - 2022 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae