Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Marriage is No Protection for Crime”

Coverture, Sex, and Marital Rape in Eighteenth-Century England

Bibliographic Data

ID10065223
AuthorsLisa Forman Cody (0000-0003-4263-2308, University of Southern California, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume61
Issue4
Pages809-834
Publication date2022-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of British Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-9371 • E-ISSN: 1545-6986
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/jbr.2022.118
OpenAlexW4311640004
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited9

If coverture justified patriarchal control and legally erased many aspects of wives’ separate existence, did this mean that husbands in eighteenth-century England also enjoyed absolute authority over their wives’ sexual bodies? This article examines how contemporaries described the sexual boundaries between spouses and what wives could do when they had been violated by their husbands. Wives had few legal protections and limited social and economic resources to escape unwanted marital sex, but the small number who could afford the high costs turned to the ecclesiastical courts to legally separate from their husbands. The five case studies from the ecclesiastical courts explored here are exceptional, first, because sexual problems were at their core, and second, because unusual collateral evidence survives describing attorneys’ and judges’ opinions about spouses’ bodily rights within marriage. Whether they were seeking relief from reproductive toil, venereal infection, threat of sexual violence, or trauma from marital rape, these wives wanted to escape their husbands—but they faced hurdles. Because English ecclesiastical law did not explicitly identify sexual discord as justifying marital separation, the women's attorneys had to demonstrate that unwanted sexual relations were acts of cruelty. By invoking bodily safety, decorum and propriety, and sensibility and sympathy, advocates argued against husbands’ absolute conjugal authority. The author considers how broader transformations in beliefs about gender and sexuality may have resulted in giving wives slightly more room for protection by the second half of the eighteenth century, particularly when they faced the threat of marital rape or venereal infection

Criminology · Human sexuality · Political science · Sexual violence · Sociology · Sympathy · Gender Studies · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Historical Gender and Feminism Studies · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • A scoping review on exploring the urgency of criminalising marital rape in India

    Open Access•Shuchismita Ghosh•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2025

  • Does Mary Astell think that marriage is a form of slavery

    Samuel C Rickle, Samuel C Rickless et al.•British Journal for the History…•2026

  • The Sex Right

    Open Access•R M Ryan•Law & Social Inquiry•1995

  • Mary Astell and the Feminist Critique of Possesive Individualism

    Ruth Perry•Eighteenth-Century Studies•1990

  • Favoured or oppressed? Married women, property and ‘coverture’ in England, 1660–1800

    Open Access•Jennifer A Bailey, Joanne Bailey•Continuity and Change•2002

  • Sexual Violence, Marital Guidance, and Victorian Bodies

    Joanna Bourke•Victorian Studies•2008

  • Alice Arden to Bill Sikes

    Open Access•Martin J Wiener, Martin Wiener•Journal of British Studies•2001

  • Rape and Resistance

    Open Access•Julia Rudolph•Journal of British Studies•2000

  • Husband(ry)

    Open Access•Miranda Chaytor•Gender & History•1995

  • Coverture and Capitalism

    A L Erickson•History Workshop Journal•2005

  • Women's Bodies and the Making of Sex in Seventeenth-Century England

    Laura Gowing•Signs: Journal of Women in…•2012

Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae