Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Fittest Subject for A King's Quarrel”

An Essay on the Militia Controversy 1641-1642

Bibliographic Data

ID10066321
AuthorsLois G Schwoerer (corresponding author)
Year1971
Volume11
Issue1
Pages45-76
Publication date1971-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of British Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-9371 • E-ISSN: 1545-6986
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1086/385617
OpenAlexW2060041284
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited3

The struggle between King and Parliament in 1641-42 for command of the militia was to King Charles I “the Fittest Subject for a King's Quarrel.” As the King himself and a group of pamphleteers, preachers and members of Parliament realized, the controversy was not just a contest for control of military power. The fundamental issue was a change in England's government, a shift in sovereignty from King or King-in-Parliament to Parliament alone. As Charles explained, “Kingly Power is but a shadow” without command of the militia. His contemporaries, representing various political allegiances, also testified to the significance of the contest over the militia. They described it as the “avowed foundation” of the Civil War, “the greatest concernment” ever faced by the House of Commons, and the “great quarrel” between the King and his critics. To some men it was this dispute over military authority and the implications for government which were inherent in it, rather than disagreements about religion, taxes or foreign policy, that made civil war unavoidable. Concern about military authority first erupted in the fall of 1641 in response to a series of events – rumors of plots involving the King, the presence in London of disbanded soldiers who had returned from the war with Scotland, the “Incident” in Scotland, and above all the rebellion in Ireland which required the levying of an army to subdue those rebels

CONTEST · House of Commons · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Shadow (psychology · Sovereignty · Spanish Civil War · Subject (documents · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Historical Studies of British Isles · History · Law · Scottish History and National Identity

  • The Great Council of Parliament and the First Ordinances

    Open Access•Michael Mendle•Journal of British Studies•1992

  • The English Civil War and after, 1642–1658

    Open Access•Robert Parry, R H Parry•English Civil War and After,…•1970

  • Tracts on Liberty in the Puritan Revolution, 1638-1647

    George H Sabine, W Haller•The Philosophical Review•1935

  • The Complete Prose Works of John Milton

    Open Access•Douglas Bush•Renaissance News•1961

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,03
Citation span1992 - 1992 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae