Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Tis a Misfortune to Be a Great Ladie”

Maternal Mortality in the British Aristocracy, 1558–1959

Datos Bibliográficos

ID10066864
AutoresJudith S Lewis (autor de correspondencia), Judith Lewis
Año1998
Volumen37
Número1
Páginas26-53
Fecha de publicación1998-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of British Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0021-9371 • E-ISSN: 1545-6986
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1086/386150
OpenAlexW2096566197
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas5
Referencias citadas22

As long ago as 1981, the distinguished demographers E. A. Wrigley and R. S. Schofield threw out a challenge to historians. “A fully satisfactory interpretation of population history,” they offered, “must embrace a wide spectrum of related topics and techniques.” Such a history would “require an alertness for opportunities to quantify historical evidence and to make effective use of statistical techniques,” they continued, but it would be “equally alive to the importance of studying the attitudes of individuals and groups wherever possible. The family,” they concluded, “is the prime institutional form in population history, and the births, marriages and deaths of its members were affected by their behavioral conventions and beliefs as well as by their social and economic circumstances.” The British aristocracy is an ideal subject for such a multifaceted, family-oriented view of population history. Thanks to T. H. Hollingsworth and other demographers, the statistical record of their population history is probably better established than that of any other social group, while thanks to their own historical importance and privileged status, their domestic experiences are richly documented. Consequently, their social mores and personal attitudes can be identified along with their demographics. While we normally assume that privileged social groups are healthier and generally live longer than those more humble in station, commonplace expectations have for centuries been reversed when it comes to one component of population history—maternal mortality. Popular culture has insisted, at least since the time of Rousseau, that ladies of fashion paid for their pleasures by being feeble and overly delicate, too weak to withstand the rigors of childbirth

Aristocracy (class · Genealogy · Interpretation (philosophy · Mores · Political science · Politics · Population · Social history (medicine · Sociology · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Demography · Global Maternal and Child Health · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History · Law · Medicine · Philosophy

  • Reconsidering maternal mortality in medieval England

    Open Access•Rachel Podd•Continuity and Change•2020

  • Demography and the midwives

    Open Access•Alannah Tomkins•Continuity and Change•2010

  • Medical and Demographic History

    Bob Woods, R Woods•Social History of Medicine•2007

  • The Hazards of Wealth

    Peter Razzell, Christine Spence•Social History of Medicine•2006

  • Counting Nineteenth-Century Maternal Deaths

    Rebecca Kippen•Historical Methods A Journal of…•2005

  • Women's position and demographic change

    Karen Oppenheim Mason, Nora Federici et al.•Women's position and demographic…•1993

  • The family, sex and marriage in England, 1500-1800

    Lawrence Stone•The family, sex and marriage in…•1979

  • English Landed Society in the Nineteenth Century

    F M L Thompson•English Landed Society in the…•2013

  • The Family, Sex and Marriage in England, 1500-1800

    Philippe Aries, Lawrence Stone•The American Historical Review•1978

  • The Modern Rise of Population

    Evelyn Bernette Ackerman, Thomas Mckeown•The American Historical Review•1977

  • Beckford of Fonthill

    Kenneth W Graham, Brian Fothergill•Eighteenth-Century Studies•1982

  • Chronicles of confinement

    Open Access•Cynthia A Huff, Cynthia Huff•Women s Studies International Forum•1987

  • Maternal Health in the English Aristocracy

    J S Lewis•Journal of Social History•1983

  • Birth intervals

    Robert G Potter•Population Studies•1963

  • Women as Mothers in Pre-Industrial England

    Jane Humphries•Population Studies•1991

  • Women's Position and Demographic Change

    Greenhalgh, Susan Greenhalgh et al.•Population and Development Review•1996

  • The Demography of the British Peerage

    Peter Razzell, T H Hollingsworth•The Economic History Review•1966

  • The Population History of England 1541-1871. A Reconstruction

    T H Hollingsworth, E A Wrigley et al.•Population Studies•1982

  • The Modern Rise of Population

    Roger Schofield, Thomas Mckeown•Population Studies•1977

  • The World We Have Gained

    Geoffrey Mcnicoll, Lloyd Bonfield et al.•Population and Development Review•1987

  • Selective Discrimination against Female Children in Rural Punjab, India

    M Das Gupta•Population and Development Review•1987

  • The Rise of the Egalitarian Family

    Henry Horwitz, Randolph Trumbach•The Journal of Interdisciplinary…•1979

  • Health, Medicine and Mortality in the Sixteenth Century

    Gerald L Geison, Charles Webster•The Journal of Interdisciplinary…•1982

  • The Population History of England 1541-1871. A Reconstruction

    Open Access•E A Wrigley, Richard S Schofield•Population•1982

  • Silent Sisterhood

    Open Access•Leonore Davidoff•Sociology•1976

Obras citantes distintas5
Citas por año0,24
Intervalo de citas2005 - 2020 (16)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 5
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae