Popularity in Early Modern England (ca. 1580–1642)
Looking Again at Thing and Concept
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10066916 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Cesare Cuttica (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-27 |
| Publication date | 2019-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of British Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0021-9371 • E-ISSN: 1545-6986 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/jbr.2018.173 |
| OpenAlex | W2922878370 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 42 |
An important object of study in the historiography of early modern England, popularity has been examined in relation to figures such as the Earl of Essex and the Duke of Buckingham. It has been equally accounted for as the activity of MPs who fostered the cause of patriotic and freeborn Englishmen during the absolutist reigns of the early Stuarts. Popularity has also been dealt with when addressing resistance theory and people's power in pre-societal arrangements (“popular power”) and with regard to the popular component within a mixed government (“popular sovereignty”). Far less studied is another meaning of popularity , identified with direct democracy and its practices (“popular government”). This article shows how a large portion of public debate between the 1580s and 1642 focused on what were perceived as the threats of democratic strategies pursued by various (subversive) actors in England. Besides setting forth a revised understanding of the pejorative “popular” that distinguishes it from constitutional (republican) meanings on the one hand and from elite or royal popularity seeking on the other, this article unearths usages that presented it as an anarchic empowerment of the meanest of people—neither a mere theoretical sovereignty nor a mere right to be represented by one body in a mixed regime. Considering a composite range of sources and analyzing political, social, and, above all, ecclesiastical controversies, the article explains what democratic popularity was thought to stand for, who its exponents were, and how it was attacked from a wide spectrum of perspectives
Democracy · Elite · Pejorative · Political science · Politics · Popular sovereignty · Popularity · Power (physics · Sociology · Sovereignty · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History · Law · Scottish History and National Identity
Anglicans and Puritans?
The Figure of the Crowd in Early Modern London
Classical Humanism and Republicanism in English Political Thought, 1570–1640
A Commonwealth of the People
The Elizabethan Puritan movement
Richard Bancroft and Elizabethan Anti-Puritanism
Antipuritanism
Origins of Democratic Culture
Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective
Early Modern Democracy in the Grisons
Law and Politics in Jacobean England
England in Conflict, 1603-1660
The Politics of Commonwealth
England on Edge
The Reign of Elizabeth I
Puritanism and Its Discontents
Early Modern Democracy in the Grisons
The Figure of the Crowd in Early Modern London
The Elizabethan Puritan Movement
Selling the Tudor Monarchy
Shakespeare and the Popular Voice
Introduction
Was There an Alternative to the Personal Rule? Charles I, the Privy Council and the Parliament of 1629
The Third Citizen
Politics, Religion and Popularity in Early Stuart Britain
Licensing the Press
Religion and the Rise of Liberal-Democratic Ideology in 17th-Century England
The Public Voice of Women
The Growth of the Electorate in England From 1600 to 1715
| Highly cited | No |
|---|