The Gamekeeper and English Rural Society, 1660-1830
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10068515 |
|---|---|
| Authors | P B Munsche (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1981 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 82-105 |
| Publication date | 1981-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of British Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0021-9371 • E-ISSN: 1545-6986 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1086/385774 |
| OpenAlex | W2048834484 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 8 |
Among the individuals who populated rural England in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, few were more unloved than the gamekeeper. That he was regularly damned at the village alehouse is not, perhaps, all that surprising. The gamekeeper was, after all, responsible for enforcing the highly unpopular laws “for the preservation of the game.” It was he who searched laborers' cottages for snares, nets and illicit game; it was he too who hauled poachers before the local justice of the peace for summary trial and punishment. But if the gamekeeper was hated by the poor, his standing in other quarters was not notably higher. Stewards questioned his honesty, foxhunters denounced him as a vulpicide, and the press was always eager to brand him as a rank hypocrite. Defenders were rare and cautious. Even Richard Jefferies, author of a very sympathetic portrait of a keeper he had known in his youth, nevertheless felt compelled to acknowledge “the abuse lavished upon [gamekeepers] as a class—often, it is to be feared, too well deserved.” Historians, for their part, have made little effort to discover whether that abuse was in fact deserved. Those who have not ignored the question altogether have usually been content to repeat the charges hurled at gamekeepers by their contemporaries. In the view of one of the more recent historians of the game laws, for example, the gamekeeper “was usually some bold pugnacious labourer, often a former poacher chosen on the maxim ‘set a thief to catch a thief.’... He could not often resist the constant temptation to sell game on the sly ....And the combination of igonorance and authority all too often made him into a brutal and arrogant man.”
Criminology · Curran · Economic Justice · Honesty · Maxim · Political science · Punishment (psychology · Sociology · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.13 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1986 - 2025 (40) |
| Highly cited | No |