Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Petitions and the Petition of Right

Bibliographic Data

ID10068546
AuthorsElizabeth Read Foster (Bryn Mawr College, corresponding author)
Year1974
Volume14
Issue1
Pages21-45
Publication date1974-11-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of British Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-9371 • E-ISSN: 1545-6986
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1086/385665
OpenAlexW2110391849
LanguageEN
Citations received15
References cited5

Proceedings of parliament, said Sir Edward Coke in 1624, are of four sorts: by bill, judicature, petition of grace and petition of right. The purpose of this paper is to explore certain aspects of procedure by petition in the reigns of James I and Charles I and to consider the Petition of Right of 1628 in relation to other petitions which preceded it. The substance of the Petition of Right is well known. It stated that contrary to the laws of the realm, men had been required under duress to grant loans and pay other charges to the crown which had not been voted by parliament. They had been imprisoned without cause shown, tried by martial law in time of peace, and forced to receive into their homes soldiers and mariners billeted upon them. The Petition asked that these practices, which contravened the rights and liberties of the kingdom, should cease. The form of the Petition, together with its answer, is less well understood than its substance and is often considered unique. It has sometimes been regarded as a declaratory act, sometimes compared to a private bill, or to the petition, also called a petition of right, by which an individual initiated action against the crown. To discover what the Petition meant to men of the seventeenth century, it may be useful first to look at the events that surrounded Charles' several answers to it, and then to examine the petition as a normal form of procedure, of which the Petition of Right was a dramatic example

Duty · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Realm · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law

  • Leveller Women Petitioners and the Rhetoric of Power in the English Revolution (1640-1660)

    Open Access•Claire Gheeraert–graffeuille, Claire Gheeraert‐graffeuille•Anglophonia Caliban/Sigma•2010

  • The Revolutionary Black Roots of Slavery's Abolition in Massachusetts

    Chernoh M Sesay, Chernoh M Sesay Jr•The New England Quarterly•2014

  • Observations on Early Stuart Parliamentary History

    Open Access•Stephen D White•Journal of British Studies•1979

  • The Popular Politics of Local Petitioning in Early Modern England

    Open Access•Brodie Waddell•Journal of British Studies•2024

  • The Foreign Policy Debate in the House of Commons in 1621

    Open Access•Conrad Russell•The Historical Journal•1977

  • The problem with early-modern petitions

    Open Access•Martin Almbjär•European Review of History Revue…•2019

  • Going round in circles

    E D Jones•Journal of Medieval History•1989

  • The laws of nature and the nature of law

    Open Access•Adam Parr•History of European Ideas•2024

  • Public order, petitioning and freedom of assembly

    Robin Handley•The Journal of Legal History•1986

  • Rent-seeking, reform, and conflict

    Open Access•Touria Jaaidane, Olivier Musy et al.•Public Choice•2023

  • The Legal Status of the Petition of Right

    Open Access•L J Reeve•The Historical Journal•1986

  • From Requête to Petition

    Open Access•Hannah Weiss Muller•The Historical Journal•2016

  • A New Curia Regis

    Open Access•Allen Horstman•The Historical Journal•1982

  • Recruitment by Petition

    Open Access•Daniel Carpenter•Perspectives on Politics•2016

  • Congressional Representation by Petition

    Open Access•Maggie Blackhawk, Daniel Carpenter et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2021

  • The Painful Labour of Mr. Elsyng

    Elizabeth Read Foster•Transactions of the American…•1972

  • Opinion in the House of Commons on the Proposal for a Petition of Right, 6 May, 1628

    Harold Hulme•The English Historical Review•1935

  • Bibliographical Aids to Research XXII

    Open Access•Robert C Johnson•Historical Research•1971

  • The Parliamentary Diary of Robert Bowyer, 1606-1607

    Witt Bowden, Robert Bowyer et al.•The American Historical Review•1932

Citations per year0.31
Citation span1977 - 2024 (48)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae