Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Same Game, New Tricks

What Makes a Good Strategy in the Prisoner’s Dilemma

Bibliographic Data

ID10071831
AuthorsAndrzej Pelc (0000-0003-0598-1218, Département d'informatique Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, Québec), Krzysztof J Pelc (0000-0001-8122-0539, Department of Government Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.)
Year2009
Volume53
Issue5
Pages774-793
Publication date2009-07-29
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Conflict Resolution (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-0027 • E-ISSN: 1552-8766
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0022002709339045
OpenAlexW2057059921
LanguageEN
References cited23

The aim of this article is to distinguish between strategies in the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma on the basis of their relative performance in a given population set. We first define a natural order on such strategies that disregards isolated disturbances, by using the limit of time-average payoffs. This order allows us to consider one strategy as strictly better than another in some population of strategies. We then determine a strategy σ to be ‘‘robust,’’ if in any population consisting of copies of two types of strategies, σ itself and some other strategy τ, the strategy σ is never worse than τ. We present a large class of such robust strategies. Strikingly, robustness can accommodate an arbitrary level of generosity, conditional on the strength of subsequent retaliation; and it does not require symmetric retaliation. Taken together, these findings allow us to design strategies that significantly lessen the problem of noise, without forsaking performance. Finally, we show that no strategy exhibits robustness in all population sets of three or more strategy types

Dilemma · Game theory · Generosity · Iterated function · Mathematical economics · Mathematical optimization · Population · Prisoner's dilemma · Robustness (evolution · Strategic dominance · Computer Science · Evolution and Genetic Dynamics · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Mathematics

  • Evolution and the Theory of Games

    John Maynard Smith•Did Darwin Get It Right?•1988

  • The Limits of Safety

    John F Padgett, Scott D Sagan•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1994

  • Rethinking WTO Trade Sanctions

    Open Access•Steve Charnovitz•American Journal of International…•2001

  • Theory of international politics

    Kenneth Neal Waltz•Theory of international politics•1979

  • Reciprocity and Shared Knowledge Structures in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game

    Open Access•Diana Richards•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2001

  • The Optimal Level of Generosity in a Selfish, Uncertain Environment

    Open Access•Per Molander•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1985

  • Conflict And Cooperation in International Relations

    Open Access•Stephen J Majeski, Shane Frick et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1995

  • Nice Strategies in a World of Relative Gains

    Open Access•Marc L Busch, Marc Busch et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1993

  • How to Cope with Noise in the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma

    Open Access•Jian Wu, Jianzhong Wu et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1995

  • Optimal Retaliation for Optimal Cooperation

    Open Access•Ulrich Mueller•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1987

  • Effective Choice in the Prisoner's Dilemma

    Open Access•Robert Axelrod•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1980

  • Sheep in Sheep's clothing

    Andrew H Kydd, Andrew Kydd•Security Studies•1997

  • The Limits of Safety

    Harvey M Sapolsky, Scott D Sagan•The Journal of Interdisciplinary…•1995

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae