Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Reflections on the Origins of the 'Third Period

Bukharin, the Comintern, and the Political Economy of Weimar Germany

Bibliographic Data

ID10074182
AuthorsNicholas N Kozlov (corresponding author), Eric D Weitz, Eric Weitz (0000-0002-7447-4060)
Year1989
Volume24
Issue3
Pages387-410
Publication date1989-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Contemporary History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-0094 • E-ISSN: 1461-7250
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/002200948902400301
OpenAlexW2061763285
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited1

The Sixth Congress of the Communist International met in Moscow in the summer of 1928. In his opening presentation, Nikolai Bukharin depicted a capitalist world entering a new period of crisis. He noted signs of great economic progress - significant technological advances, the growing concentration of production, a general increase in national incomes. But alongside these advances existed high levels of structural unemployment, an intensified exploitation of labour, growing interpenetration of state and economic power, and increasingly uneven levels of development among nations. All these indicated an accentuation of the internal contradictions of the system. The crisis phase into which capitalism was now entering was fundamental and not merely cyclical.1 The tactical conclusions that the Comintern drew from this analysis are well-known. A new period of capitalist crisis - the 'third period' in Comintern parlance - was creating a new revolutionary upsurge. All forms of working-class struggles had to be elevated into assaults on the existing system, and all forms of collaboration with the organs of the capitalist system had to be opposed. This necessitated, in particular, an intensified struggle against social democracy, 'in view of its new, completely bourgeois and actively imperialistic ideology'. Coalitions with the reformist unions and social democratic parties were inadmissible; only united fronts 'from below' were on the agenda for the Comintern parties. The term 'social fascism' soon moved to the forefront of communist vocabulary.2 The policy enunciated by the Sixth Congress has long been associated with Stalin. With a few exceptions, notably a surprisingly

Bourgeoisie · Capitalism · Communism · Democracy · Economic history · Economics · Ideology · Period (music · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · Working class · Anarchism and Radical Politics · Cuban History and Society · Law · Political Economy and Marxism

  • Japanese and Chinese Immigrant Activists

    Open Access•Josephine Fowler•Japanese and Chinese Immigrant…•2007

  • A Global Radical Waterfront

    Open Access•HOLGER WEISS•A Global Radical Waterfront•2021

  • Korean Nationalism” Seen through the Comintern Prism, 1920s–30s

    Владимир Тихонов•Region Regional Studies of Russia…•2017

  • Social Fascism’, ‘Stalinisation’ and the Case of the Saxon Communist Party, 1928-9

    Norman Laporte•Labour History Review•2002

  • Communists and the Fight for Jobs and Revolution

    Open Access•Rodney D Green, Michael Isaacson et al.•The Review of Black Political…•2011

  • Bolshevizing Communist Women

    Open Access•Sara Ann Sewell•Central European History•2012

  • Introduction to Bukharin

    Keith Smith•Economy and Society•1979

Citations per year0.25
Citation span2002 - 2021 (20)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae