H.G. Wells's ‘Liberal Fascism’
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10074790 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Philip M Coupland (corresponding author), Philip Coupland |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 541-558 |
| Publication date | 2000-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Contemporary History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-0094 • E-ISSN: 1461-7250 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/002200940003500402 |
| OpenAlex | W2090583399 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
During the 1930s H.G. Wells's theory of revolutionary praxis centred around a concept of ‘liberal fascism’ whereby the Wellsian ‘liberal’ utopia would be achieved by an authoritarian élite. Taking inspiration from the militarized political movements of the 1930s, this marked a development in the Wellsian theory of revolution from the ‘open conspiracy’ of the 1920s. Although both communist and fascist movements evinced some of the desired qualities of a Wellsian vanguard, it was fascism rather than communism which came closest to Wells's ideal. However, in practice, despite the failure of approaches to parties of the left and centre as possible agents of revolution, Wells rejected the British Union of Fascists. The disparity between Wells's theory and his actions when faced by the reality of fascism echoes the unresolved tension between ends and means at the heart of the concept of ‘liberal fascism’
Aesthetics · Ancient history · Authoritarianism · Communism · Democracy · Ideal (ethics · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Utopia · Vanguard · History · Italian Fascism and Post-war Society · Law · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,2 |
| Citation span | 2006 - 2019 (14) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |