Bishop Compton and the Revolution of 1688
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10079803 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David H Hosford (Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1972 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 209-218 |
| Publication date | 1972-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Ecclesiastical History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-0469 • E-ISSN: 1469-7637 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0022046900056177 |
| OpenAlex | W2022060648 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
Recently the revolution of 1688 has again become a fashionable topic. Renewed research and reinterpretation have provided valuable new insights into the role of William of Orange as well as the larger European setting of the event. The danger exists, however, that the pendulum of historical interpretation will swing too far in discounting the significance of the domestic scene. While much of the glory and simplicity of the traditional Whig approach have evaporated under close scrutiny, the fact still remains that the movement against James n was basically English in origin. In this connexion the need clearly emerges for reexamination and further investigation into the part played by those prominent in promoting the conspiracy. The point is nicely illustrated by the case of Henry Compton, bishop of London, whose importance to the revolutionary cause in the last few months before Torbay has never been fully appreciated
Aesthetics · Art · Epistemology · Event (particle physics · Glory · Interpretation (philosophy · Literature · Physics · Political science · Reinterpretation · Scrutiny · Simplicity · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Historical Studies of British Isles · History · Law · Philosophy · Scottish History and National Identity
| Citations per year | 0.02 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1976 - 1976 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |