The Alleged Second Session of the Council of Nicaea
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10082022 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Colm Luibhéid (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1983 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 165-174 |
| Publication date | 1983-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Ecclesiastical History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-0469 • E-ISSN: 1469-7637 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0022046900036988 |
| OpenAlex | W2333625203 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 1 |
Was there a second session of the Council of Nicaea? To that question – first posed and affirmatively answered by Otto Seeck – there have been numerous responses, mostly in the form of bald assertions of one kind or another. Occasionally there have been lengthier discussions of the matter, but with no emerging consensus, and it is still the case that opposite views continue to surface in discussions of the aftermath of the first ecumenical council. Furthermore, among the statements accepting or rejecting the fact of a second session, it is regularly unclear whether the problem at issue is that of a reassembly at Nicaea of all the bishops who had gathered there in 325, a reassembly of these same bishops at some other unspecified place, or a reunion somewhere of only some of those who had participated at the major gathering
Bishops · Library science · Plenary session · Political science · Session (web analytics · Byzantine Studies and History · Classical Antiquity Studies · Computer Science · Historical and Religious Studies of Rome · History · Law
| Citations per year | 0.06 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1992 - 1992 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |