Relations of History and Theory
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10098802 |
|---|---|
| Authors | J M Clark (Columbia University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1942 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue | S1 |
| Pages | 132-142 |
| Publication date | 1942-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Economic History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-0507 • E-ISSN: 1471-6372 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0022050700083480 |
| OpenAlex | W2112129289 |
| Language | EN |
Most economic theorists nowadays appreciate that particular theories are peculiarly relevant to particular historical situations, and gain their chief importance from this relevance. In place of one absolute set of propositions, economists are becoming accustomed to the idea that their theoretical arsenal needs to include, for example, weapons suited to conditions of approximately full employment, and different weapons suited to conditions of depression. The dependence of theory on conditions properly goes further than this. We need to ask whether our fundamental concepts are appropriate to the historical conditions of the time to which they are to be applied
Ask price · Economics · Economy · Epistemology · Great Depression · Law and economics · Political science · Positive economics · Relevance (law · Set (abstract data type · Computer Science · Economic theories and models · Economic Theory and Institutions · Law · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |