Russian Expansion to the East Through the Eighteenth Century
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10102498 |
|---|---|
| Authors | C M Foust (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1961 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 469-482 |
| Publication date | 1961-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Economic History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-0507 • E-ISSN: 1471-6372 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s002205070010899x |
| OpenAlex | W2122461889 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 3 |
Most historical generalizations must be approached with a wary eye; Kliuchevskii's dictum that “the history of Russia is the history of a country in the process of colonization” is no exception. Taken unjudiciously this dictum grievously compresses time, focuses attention on only a single historical dynamic, lends to the historical process a pre-ordained character which is indeed usually absent. The historian's critical apparatus is dulled, and the delicate nuance and important variant are neglected. Moscow, it has been argued, was a chosen town to lead the southward and eastward expansion of the Great Russian people because of her physical location on the edge of the Valdai hills giving her control of the crucial waterways of European Russia. (Why not, for the same reasons, Vladimir or Rostov, Suzdal or even Uglich?) Muscovite expansion forms the central thread of Russian history, determining the economic and political structure of the state. It was the expansion which fixed and defined the necessity of the “service state,” which in turn subjugated all classes and groups to the all powerful tsardom. (Why not the reverse—the “service state” defining the expansion—and why did not an independent merchant class come to control the expansion, and the towns and politics of Muscovy?) To pursue the argument to a logical conclusion, die modern audioritarian state in Russia (bodi Soviet and Tsarist) is essentially a continuation of old Muscovy. As the latter expanded and colonized, so must the former. (The role of the Party and the Marxist dialectic, by this line of argument, has no fundamental historical significance.)
Dialectic · Economic history · Epistemology · Genealogy · Historiography · Marxist philosophy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Russian history · Sociology · State (computer science · History · Law · Philosophy · Russia and Soviet political economy · Soviet and Russian History
| Citations per year | 0.05 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1988 - 2018 (31) |
| Highly cited | No |