Laissez Faire in Georgia, 1732–1860

It is necessary to indicate at the outset the general character of the historical material with which this paper deals. I have been able to discover in this period of Georgia's history almost no advocacy or discussion of the doctrine of laissez faire as such. On the other hand, one finds much discussion of private and public enterprise which, if removed from the context of events, would seem to involve most of the commonly accepted tenets of laissez faire. Lastly, there are the main currents of social action, which, upon investigation, are found to have comprised a varying mixture of private and public activities. It is difficult, if not impossible, to determine the logic of the social policy which directed these currents simply by observing the varying proportions of private and public action; it would be necessary first to go behind the action and study both the ends and the means. In the limited space allotted to this paper, it is possible to present only the barest outlines of the more important events and discussions in which the issue of public interference or of private versus public action arose. Interpretations and evaluations must be left, for the most part, to additional studies

Action (physics · Aesthetics · Character (mathematics · Context (archaeology · Doctrine · Economics · Laissez-faire · Law and economics · Period (music · Political science · Private enterprise · Sociology · Space (punctuation) · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism

• The American System

  Open Access•Robert A Lively•The Business History Review•1955

  Add to list