Autocracy and the Factory Order In Early Russian Industrialization
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10105347 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gaston V Rimlinger (Princeton University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1960 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 67-92 |
| Publication date | 1960-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Economic History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-0507 • E-ISSN: 1471-6372 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0022050700106217 |
| OpenAlex | W2099705108 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 10 |
The Tsarist government played an important and fateful role in the development of the relationship between workers and employers in the early stages of Russian industrialization. Although the general character of this role is well known to historians, further study and reexamination of Tsarist labor policy, in the light of the contemporary concern with economic development, is invited by the Soviet publication in recent years of documentary evidence on nineteenth century labor problems. An attempt will be made in this article to integrate some of the new evidence with data from earlier sources in an analysis of the methods used by the Tsarist government to cope with the problem posed by internal government of industry in an era of growing labor unrest. It will focus on the period between the Emancipation and the 1905 Revolution. Russia did not become an industrial state during this period, but industry made enough progress to bring the country face to face with the modern labor problem. It was a period in which social and economic relations, rooted in feudal traditions, began to undergo significant changes in response to industrial growth. Labor unrest and protest are one of the chief symptoms of the problems inherent in this socio-economic readjustment. To understand the Tsarist approach to these problems it will be necessary to begin with a brief outline of the social milieu of Russian industrialization and of the governmental attitude toward industrial discipline and unrest before the Emancipation. The second section of the article covers the period between the Emancipation and the mideighties, during which the government did not formally regulate the internal order of the factory but was not unconcerned with the relations between employers and workers. The third section covers the period after 1886, when the internal factory order was subject to formal regulation and official inspection
Autocracy · Democracy · Economic history · Economics · Emancipation · Feudalism · Government (linguistics · Industrialisation · Order (exchange · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science · Unrest · History · Law · Russia and Soviet political economy
| Citations per year | 0.12 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1974 - 2023 (50) |
| Highly cited | No |