The Multidimensional Structure of Mythological Hybrid (Part-Human, Part-Animal) Figures
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10122103 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Harvey Nash (California State University, Dominguez Hills, corresponding author), Henry Pieszko (California State University, Dominguez Hills) |
| Year | 1982 |
| Volume | 106 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 35-55 |
| Publication date | 1982-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of General Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-1309 • E-ISSN: 1940-0888 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00221309.1982.9710971 |
| OpenAlex | W2035756436 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 6 |
Thirty young adults scaled paired pictures of 32 mythological hybrid (part-human, part-animal) beings for perceived similarity, each S rating only a fraction of the 496 unique stimulus pairs. Four factors were extracted from the data by multidimensional scaling, each factor representing a dimension which Ss used to organize perceived differences between the stimuli. Factor 1 reflected several characteristics; it primarily represented an anatomical configuration characterized by animal-headedness versus human-headedness and by two human legs versus other kinds of body support. Factor 2 reflected several characteristics: differences in civilization, in artistic medium, in artistic style, and in sexual anatomy; also, the presence or absence of anomalies involving laterality. Factor 3 represented mammalian quadrupedal versus human bipedal body support. Factor 4 represented the presence or absence of wings. These factors were compared to factors previously yielded by unidimensional studies which employed mythological hybrid stimuli
Art · Cognitive psychology · Developmental psychology · Factor (programming language · Laterality · Multidimensional scaling · Mythology · Stimulus (psychology · Action Observation and Synchronization · Animal and Plant Science Education · Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior · Communication · Computer Science · Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |