Vidyānandin’s Discussion with the Buddhist on Svasaṃvedana, Pratyakṣa and Pramāṇa
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10126432 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jayandra Soni (0000-0003-4570-4055, Universität Innsbruck, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 1003-1017 |
| Publication date | 2019-06-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Indian Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-1791 • E-ISSN: 1573-0395 |
| Publisher | Springer Nature (PUBLISHER • SG) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10781-019-09405-1 |
| OpenAlex | W2954669223 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 10 |
Two of the terms in the title are from Vidyānandin’s Tattvārtha-śloka-vārttika (TAŚV, 1, 6, 11), which is his commentary on Umāsvāti’s Tattvārtha-sūtra (TAS). Sūtra 6 of the TAS states the following: pramāṇa-nayair adhigamaḥ, ‘knowledge—of the seven categories—is obtained through the pramāṇas and the nayas’). Vidyānandin’s commentary on this sūtra 6 entails a total of 56 ślokas, with his own prose vārttika on each of them in varying lengths. TAŚV 1, 6, 1–8 deal with particulars and universals, for which he uses the synonymous pairs aṃśa/aṃśin and avayava/avayavin. That he is attacking the Buddhist position regarding this age old theme in Indian philosophy, is evident also in that he quotes Dharmakīrti’s Pramāṇa-vārttika. By the time he comes to his TAŚV 1, 6, 6, he establishes that an object as a whole is open to perception and that the Buddhist also accepts perception as a valid means of knowledge, but does not accept the perception of an object as a whole. From TAŚV 1, 6, 11 onwards Vidyānandin continues with the same theme, elaborating his attack of the Buddhist view even further, doing so in terms of svasaṃvedana, pratyakṣa and pramāṇa (self-awareness, perception and valid means of knowledge). The presentation will attempt to deal with these concepts in order to see how Vidyānandin vindicates the Jaina position vis-à-vis the Buddhist one. This presentation will continue from my previous study of Vidyānandin’s TAŚV 1, 6, 1–10
Buddhism · Epistemology · Philosophy of religion · Theology · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Philosophy · Religious studies
Sanskrit and Indian Studies. Essays in Honour of Daniel H. H. Ingalls
Three Natures, Three Stages
Self-Awareness (svasaṃvedana) in Dignāga’s Pramāṇasamuccaya and -vṛtti
Upayoga, according to Kundakunda and Umāsvāti
Did Dign?ga accept four types of perception
The Buddhist theory of relation between pramā and pramā na
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |