Menelaus, non-Aaronite priest in pre-Maccabean Jerusalem
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10137490 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Samuele Rocca (0000-0003-3900-8037, Ariel University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 77 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 24-48 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Jewish Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-2097 • E-ISSN: 2056-6689 |
| Publisher | Liverpool University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.3828/jjs.2026.77.1.24 |
| OpenAlex | W7151321281 |
| Language | EN |
This article explores the possibility that Menelaus, the Jewish high priest, was not of Aaronic descent. While in 2 Macc. 3:4–6 Simon, Menelaus’ brother, is described as being ‘from the tribe of Benjamin’, most scholars, relying on a few versions of the Old Latin, argue that it should instead be translated as ‘from the priestly clan of Bilgah’. And yet a careful examination of the surviving versions of the Old Latin reveals that ‘Bilgah’ appears to be an interpretive modification aimed at justifying how a non-Aaronite could become high priest. Moreover, the Greek term phylê cannot denote a priestly division. Furthermore, the assumption that Simon was appointed as an overseer of the Temple does not necessarily indicate that he was a priest. Additional passages from 1 Maccabees and the Testament of Moses may also be interpreted as supporting the argument that Menelaus was not of Aaronic descent
Argument (complex analysis) · Clan · Judaism · Term (time) · Tribe · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |