Distance and the ‘Reaction’ to Distance as a Function of Distance
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10138901 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jay Beaman (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1974 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 220-231 |
| Publication date | 1974-07-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Leisure Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-2216 • E-ISSN: 2159-6417 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00222216.1974.11970187 |
| OpenAlex | W2790225401 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 16 |
| References cited | 7 |
Distance and the 'Reaction' to Distance as a Function of Distance" is a phrase designed to emphasize the need for more analysis of the behavioral significance of gravity functions. This paper, in pursuing the behavioral significance theme, concentrates on research related to the "inertia models" suggested by Wolfe. Actually, alternative approaches to understanding the significance of gravity functions used in modeling travel behavior are introduced. However, the particular alternative pursued in depth is the methodology endorsed for understanding travel decisions in marginal terms.The most important concept presented is that if an inertia model of travel behavior of the type Wolfe describes is accepted, the decision to visit a given location must involve a reaction to distance in marginal rather than absolute terms. To quantify concepts, the paper focuses on the effect of going one more unit of distance beyond a given point. This quantification being carried out leads to the conclusion that analysis of reaction to distance in marginal terms should be based on the properties of an "impedance due to distance function" IDF (d), which may be derived from the distance part of a gravity function g(x) by: In the paper, a discussion of five gravity functions provides a basis for illustrating points and methods introduced. IDF(d)'s are derived for the functions considered. As well, conjectures on the response to distance suggested by the functions are checked by reference to the impedance of distance functions derived for the gravity functions introduced.Important conclusions relate to the fact that it is very easy to misinterpret the significance of gravity functions as to how they imply decisions are made if one only looks at the shape of such functions. Actually, it is shown that in cases where one may think each new mile to be traveled offers more resistance than the last, each new mile offers less resistance or constant resistance. One of the cases presented, in fact, involves impedance which decreases and then increases to approach infinity.1KEYWORDS: Distancemarginal effectoutdoor recreation modelgravity modelinertia
Biology · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Function (biology · Social distance · Sociology · Computer Science · Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies · Innovations in Educational Methods · Mathematics · Medicine · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy
Distance Decay and the Impact of Effective Tourism Exclusion Zones on International Travel Flows
Management science and operations research in travel and tourism
The Study of International Tourism Demand
Recreation Expenditures and Opportunity Theory
A New Method for Analyzing Outdoor Recreation Trip Data
A Comparison of Long-Haul and Short-Haul Business Tourists of Hong Kong
Role of source-destination proximity in international inbound tourist arrival
Spatial Structure and Behavior Response in Outdoor Recreation Participaton
The influence of distance and prices on the choice of tourist destinations
Are neighbour tourists more sensitive to crowding? The impact of distance on the crowding-out effect in tourism
Assessing Advertising in a Hierarchical Decision Model
Operations research applications to tourism
Second-home domestic tourism
Outdoor recreation expenditures and the effects of spatial structure
The object of my desire! Exploring the antecedents of long-haul travel intentions in an era of uncertainty
Influence of Nature Motivation on Price Sensitivity
| Citations per year | 0.31 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1975 - 2025 (51) |
| Highly cited | No |