Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Raised and in-situ preverbal foci

A unified prosodic account

Bibliographic Data

ID10139744
AuthorsLena Borise (0000-0002-6356-7472, Department of Linguistics and Basque Studies, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU); Université Paris Cité, CNRS, Laboratoire de linguistique formelle, corresponding author), Andreas Pregla (0009-0002-1503-7730, Universität Potsdam, SFB 12873), Balázs Surányi (0000-0003-2818-9872, HUN-REN Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics & Pázmány Péter Catholic University)
Year2025
Volume62
Issue1
Pages1-34
Publication date2025-04-28
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-2267 • E-ISSN: 1469-7742
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0022226725000118
OpenAlexW4405131968
LanguageEN
References cited70

It has been shown in the literature that the preference or requirement for immediately preverbal focus placement, found in a number of languages (especially verb-/head-final ones), can result from different syntactic configurations. In some languages (e.g., in Hungarian), immediately preverbal foci are raised to a dedicated projection, accompanied by verb movement). In others (e.g., in Turkish), preverbal foci remain in situ, with any material intervening between the focus and the verb undergoing displacement), to allow for the focus–verb adjacency. We offer a unified account of the two types of preverbal foci, raised and in situ ones, based on their prosodic requirements. Specifically, we show that both types of foci require alignment with an edge of a prosodic constituent but differ in the directionality of alignment (right or left). Our analysis rests on bringing together two independent existing proposals, Focus-as-Alignment and flexible Intonational Phrase ( ɩ )-mapping. We show that this approach makes correct predictions for a number of unrelated Eurasian languages and discuss some further implications of this approach

In situ · Linguistics · Physics · Prosody · Communication · Philosophy · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Psychology · Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • The Phonology of Standard Chinese

    San Duanmu•The phonology of standard chinese•2007

  • The Syntax of Hungarian

    Open Access•Katalin E Ki, Katalin É Kiss et al.•Syntax of Hungarian•2002

  • Locality in WH Quantification

    Open Access•Veneeta Dayal•Locality in WH Quantification•1996

  • Dutch scrambling and the nature of discourse templates

    Open Access•Ad Neeleman, Hans Van De Koot•The Journal of Comparative…•2008

  • The Syntax‐Phonology Interface

    Open Access•Elisabeth Selkirk•The Handbook of Phonological Theory•2011

  • Semantic Interpretation In Generative Grammar

    Ray S Jackendoff•Semantic Interpretation In…•1974

  • Stability, Variation and Change of Word-Order Patterns over Time

    Rosanna Sornicola, Erich Poppe et al.•Stability, Variation and Change…•2000

  • Lectures on Government and Binding

    Noam Chomsky•Lectures on Government and Binding•1993

  • Armenian

    Jasmine Dum-Tragut•Armenian•2009

  • Flexible syntax–prosody mapping of Intonational Phrases in the context of varying verb height

    Open Access•Lena Borise, David Erschler•Phonology•2022

  • A flexible approach to the mapping of intonational phrases

    Open Access•Fatima Hamlaoui, Kriszta Szendrői•Phonology•2015

  • Focus and contrastive topic in questions and answers, with particular reference to Turkish

    Beste Kamali, Manfred Krifka•Theoretical Linguistics•2020

  • The syntax of wh-phrases, narrow foci, and neg-words in Georgian

    Open Access•Lena Borise•The Linguistic Review•2023

  • Two locations for negation

    Sadaf Munshi, Rajesh Bhatt•Linguistic Variation Yearbook•2009

  • Question words in focus positions

    K A Jayaseelan•Linguistic Variation Yearbook•2003

  • Notions and subnotions in information structure

    Open Access•Carlos Gussenhoven•Acta Linguistica Hungarica•2008

  • In need of mediation

    Open Access•Gisbert Fanselow•Acta Linguistica Hungarica•2008

  • Negative verb clusters in Mari and Udmurt and why they require postsyntactic top-down word-formation

    Open Access•Ekaterina Georgieva, Martin Salzmann et al.•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2021

  • Focus as prosodic alignment

    Open Access•Caroline Fery•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2013

  • The syntax of postverbal focus constructions in Chadic

    Open Access•Laurice Tuller•Natural Language and Linguistic…•1992

  • Left peripheral focus

    Open Access•Gisbert Fanselow, Denisa Lenertová•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2011

  • Prosody–Syntax Interaction in the Expression of Focus

    Open Access•Vieri Samek-Lodovici•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2005

  • Auxiliary focus

    Open Access•Larry M Hyman, John R Watters•Studies in African Linguistics•1984

  • A stress-based approach to the syntax of Hungarian focus

    Kriszta Szendrői•The Linguistic Review•2003

  • Expression of information structure in the Bantu language Northern Sotho

    Open Access•Sabine Zerbian•ZAS Papers in Linguistics•2006

  • Information structure in Turkish

    Open Access•Selçuk Işsever•Lingua•2003

  • Linear Asymmetries and the LCA

    Open Access•Klaus Abels, Ad Neeleman•Syntax•2012

  • "From preverbal focus to preverbal "left periphery

    Open Access•David Erschler•Lingua•2012

  • Morphological and Abstract Case

    Julie Anne Legate•Linguistic Inquiry•2008

  • Deriving Greenberg's Universal 20 and Its Exceptions

    Guglielmo Cinque•Linguistic Inquiry•2005

  • Wh-Expletives in Hindi-Urdu

    Emily Manetta•Linguistic Inquiry•2010

  • Second-Position Clitics in the vP Phase

    Arsalan Kahnemuyipour, Karine Megerdoomian•Linguistic Inquiry•2011

  • The prosodic expression of focus, contrast and givenness

    Open Access•Susanne Genzel, Shinichiro Ishihara et al.•Lingua•2015

  • Focus in Georgian and the expression of contrast

    Open Access•Stavros Skopetea, Gisbert Fanselow•Lingua•2010

  • The South Caucasian languages

    Open Access•Winfried Boeder•Lingua•2005

  • Word order and intonation in Georgian

    Open Access•Stavros Skopetea, Caroline Fery et al.•Lingua•2009

  • Intonation in the grammar of Turkish

    Open Access•Umut Özge, Cem Bozsahin•Lingua•2010

  • Syntax of information structure in Turkish

    Open Access•Yilmaz Kilicaslan, Yılmaz Kılıçaslan•Linguistics•2004

  • Focus Projection and Prosodic Prominence in Nested Foci

    Open Access•Caroline Fery, Vieri Samek-Lodovici•Language•2006

  • Identificational Focus versus Information Focus

    Katalin E Ki, Katalin É Kiss•Language•1998

  • Armenian (Yerevan Eastern Armenian and Beirut Western Armenian)

    Open Access•Scott Seyfarth, Hossep Dolatian et al.•Journal of the International…•2024

  • Prosodic subcategories in Japanese

    Open Access•Joanne Ito, Junko Itô et al.•Lingua•2013

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae