Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Persian complex predicates and the limits of inheritance-based analyses

Bibliographic Data

ID10139806
AuthorsStefan Müller (0000-0002-6315-4125, Freie Universität Berlin, corresponding author)
Year2009
Volume46
Issue3
Pages601-655
Publication date2009-11-30
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-2267 • E-ISSN: 1469-7742
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0022226709990284
OpenAlexW2032862690
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited52

Persian complex predicates pose an interesting challenge for theoretical linguistics since they have both word-like and phrase-like properties. For example, they can feed derivational processes, but they are also separable by the future auxiliary or the negation prefix. Various proposals have been made in the literature to capture the nature of Persian complex predicates, among them analyses that treat them as purely phrasal or purely lexical combinations. Mixed analyses that analyze them as words by default and as phrases in the non-default case have also been suggested. In this paper, I show that theories that rely exclusively on the classification of patterns in inheritance hierarchies cannot account for the facts in an insightful way unless they are augmented by transformations or some similar device. I then show that a lexical account together with appropriate grammar rules and an argument composition analysis of the future auxiliary has none of the shortcomings that classification-based analyses have and that it can account for both the phrasal and the word-like properties of Persian complex predicates

Argument (complex analysis · Grammar · Inheritance (genetic algorithm · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Negation · Noun · Persian · Phrase · Prefix · Word (group theory · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • The processing of bilingual (switched) compound verbs

    Open Access•Mehdi Purmohammad, Constanze Vorwerg et al.•Bilingualism Language and Cognition•2022

  • Incorporation or Quasi‐Incorporation? A Constructionist Account in Persian

    Open Access•Sahar Bahrami-Khorshid, Amir Ghorbanpour•Studia Linguistica•2021

  • The lexicon-grammar continuum

    Open Access•Reza Soltani, Laura A Janda•Constructions and Frames•2025

  • Re-thinking Compositionality in Persian Complex Predicates

    Open Access•Pollet Samvelian, Pegah Faghiri•Proceedings of the Annual Meeting…•2013

  • Complex predication and adverbial modification in Wagiman

    Daniel Krauße, Mark Harvey•Australian Journal of Linguistics•2021

  • Complex predicates, eventivity, and causative-inchoative alternation

    Open Access•Ekaterina Lyutikova, Sergei Tatevosov•Lingua•2013

  • The diversity of inflectional periphrasis in Persian

    Open Access•Olivier Bonami, Pollet Samvelian•Journal of Linguistics•2014

  • The syntactic flexibility of German and English idioms

    Open Access•Marta Wierzba, J M M Brown et al.•Journal of Linguistics•2023

  • Adverbial and attributive modification of Persian separable light verb constructions

    Open Access•Jens Fleischhauer, MOZHGAN NEISANI•Journal of Linguistics•2019

  • Periphrasis as collocation

    Open Access•Olivier Bonami•Morphology•2015

  • Word Meaning and Montague Grammar

    Open Access•David R Dowty•Word Meaning and Montague Grammar•1979

  • Simpler Syntax

    Peter W Culicover, Ray Jackendoff•Simpler syntax•2005

  • Morphology

    Joan L Bybee, Joan Bybee•Morphology•1985

  • Linear Syntax

    Andreas Kathol•Linear syntax•2000

  • Grundzüge einer deutschen Grammatik

    Gerhart Lindner•Grundlagen und Anwendung der…•1981

  • Lexikalische Argumente und Adjunkte

    Barbara Stiebels•Lexikalische Argumente und Adjunkte•1996

  • Lectures on Government and Binding

    Noam Chomsky•Lectures on Government and Binding•1993

  • Wozu Konstruktionen?

    Joachim Jacobs•Linguistische Berichte (LB)•2008

  • A Minimalist Approach to Scrambling

    Karimi, Simin Karimi•Minimalist Approach to Scrambling•2005

  • The role of prediction in construction-learning

    Open Access•Adele E Goldberg, Adele Ε Goldberg et al.•Journal of Child Language•2005

  • Beyond formalities

    M Tomasello•The Linguistic Review•2005

  • Über Komposition und Derivation

    Open Access•Tilman N Hohle•Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft•1982

  • Words by Default

    Open Access•Adele E Goldberg, Adele Ε Goldberg•Proceedings of the Annual Meeting…•1996

  • From formula to schema

    Open Access•Ewa Dąbrowska•Cognitive Linguistics•2001

  • The lexical integrity principle

    Open Access•Joan Bresnan, Sam A Mchombo et al.•Natural Language and Linguistic…•1995

  • Syntactic Categories and Persian Stress

    Open Access•Arsalan Kahnemuyipour•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2003

  • Complex verb formation in Eskimo

    Open Access•Jane Grimshaw, Ralf-Armin Mester•Natural Language and Linguistic…•1985

  • French Clitic Movement Without Clitics or Movement

    Open Access•Philip Miller, Philip H Miller et al.•Natural Language and Linguistic…•1997

  • A Theory of Predicates

    Michael Dukes, Farrell Ackerman et al.•Language•2000

  • German in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar

    Open Access•Christopher Culy, John Nerbonne et al.•Language•1997

  • Morphology by Itself

    Andrew Spencer, Mark Aronoff•Language•1994

  • A program for syntax

    Open Access•P T Geach•Synthese•1970

  • Solving the bracketing paradox

    Open Access•Stefan Müller•Journal of Linguistics•2003

  • A (phrasal) affix analysis of the Persian Ezafe

    Open Access•Pollet Samvelian•Journal of Linguistics•2007

  • On Linkhood, Topicalization and Clitic Left Dislocation

    Open Access•Theodora Alexopoulou, Dimitra Kolliakou•Journal of Linguistics•2002

  • Discussion Note

    Open Access•Stefan Müller•Language•2006

  • English relative clause constructions

    Open Access•Ivan A Sag•Journal of Linguistics•1997

  • Radical Construction Grammar

    William Croft•Radical Construction Grammar•2001

  • Situations and Attitudes

    Jerry Butterfield, Jon Barwise et al.•The Philosophical Quarterly•1986

  • Coordination of parts of words

    Open Access•Ron Artstein•Lingua•2005

  • Features, θ-Roles, and Free Constituent Order

    Gisbert Fanselow•Linguistic Inquiry•2001

  • Determinants of event type in Persian complex predicates

    Open Access•Raffaella Folli, Heidi Harley et al.•Lingua•2005

  • On the Structure of Resultative Participles in English

    David Embick•Linguistic Inquiry•2004

  • Morphology feeds syntax

    Open Access•Barbara Stiebels, Dieter Wunderlich•Linguistics•1994

  • A Paradigm-Based Theory of Morphosemantic Mismatches

    Gregory T Stump, Gregory Stump•Language•1991

  • Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions

    Charles J Fillmore, Paul Kay et al.•Language•1988

  • Grammatical Constructions and Linguistic Generalizations

    Paul Kay, Kay Paul et al.•Language•1999

Unique citing works10
Citations per year0.77
Citation span2013 - 2025 (13)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae