Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The syntactic constraint on English auxiliary contraction

Bibliographic Data

ID10140239
AuthorsRichard Hudson (0000-0002-0269-6246, University College London), Nikolas Gisborne (0009-0004-0310-2915, University of Edinburgh, corresponding author), Thomas Hikaru Clark (0000-0002-1720-0450, Moscow Institute of Thermal Technology), Eva Duran Eppler (0000-0001-8010-1765, University of Roehampton), Willem B Hollmann (0000-0001-6647-6915, University of Edinburgh), Andrew Rosta, Graeme Trousdale (0000-0002-4148-166X, University of Edinburgh)
Year2025
Pages1-32
Publication date2025-03-28
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-2267 • E-ISSN: 1469-7742
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0022226725000131
OpenAlexW4408917810
LanguageEN
References cited38

We offer a new explanation for the difference between cases where an auxiliary verb can and cannot contract, such as Kim is coming versus Kim is. Rather than a banning constraint, we argue that there is a positive syntactic licensing constraint. We consider, and reject, both the familiar Gap Restriction and a range of phonological explanations. Our analysis rests on the category of grammatical relations, valent , which includes all non-adjuncts (i.e. all subjects and complements); the analysis consists of a single claim, the F ollowing V alent C onstraint : that a contracted auxiliary has an overt following valent. We show how this analysis explains the full range of data that has been discussed in the literature and how a minor variant of the constraint captures the data of the Scots locative discovery expressions . We also propose a sociolinguistic explanation for the inability of auxiliaries to contract in certain environments, such as after a preposed negative. Finally, we suggest a functional explanation for the proposed constraint: It allows the hearer to predict the presence of a following valent and thereby to manage the burden of processing

Constraint (computer-aided design · Contraction (grammar · Linguistics · Optimality theory · Phonology · Computer Science · Lexicography and Language Studies · Mathematics · Philosophy · Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Constructionalization and Constructional Changes

    Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Graeme Trousdale•Constructionalization And…•2013

  • Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars

    John A Hawkins•Efficiency and complexity in…•2004

  • An integrated theory of language production and comprehension

    Open Access•Martin J Pickering, Simon Garrod•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2013

  • Redundancy and reduction

    Open Access•T Florian Jaeger•Cognitive Psychology•2010

  • The Now-or-Never bottleneck

    Open Access•Morten H Christiansen, Nick Chater•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2016

  • Long-term working memory.

    K Anders Ericsson, Walter Kintsch•Psychological Review•1995

  • Working memory and language

    Open Access•Alan Baddeley•Journal of Communication Disorders•2003

  • Large-scale evidence of dependency length minimization in 37 languages

    Open Access•Richard Futrell, Kyle Mahowald et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2015

  • Longman grammar of spoken and written English

    Douglas Biber•Longman grammar of spoken and…•1999

  • The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language

    Open Access•Rodney Huddleston, Geoffrey K Pullum et al.•Cambridge Grammar of the English…•2002

  • Formal Grammar, Usage Probabilities, and Auxiliary Contraction

    Open Access•Joan Bresnan•Language•2021

  • Early modern English contractions and their relevance to present-day English

    Open Access•Denis Gailor•English Today•2011

  • The magical number seven, plus or minus two

    George A Miller, George Miller•Psychological Review•1956

  • Phonological Effects on Syntactic Variation

    Arto Anttila•Annual Review of Linguistics•2016

  • Sociolinguistic Patterns in British English

    Urs Durmuller, Peter Trudgill•Language•1980

  • A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency

    Open Access•Michael A Covington, John A Hawkins•Performance Theory of Order and…•1995

  • Pathways of the Brain

    Alan S Kaye, Sydney M Lamb•Language•2000

  • A Note on Contraction

    Cedric Boeckx•Linguistic Inquiry•2000

  • Contraction, Deletion, and Inherent Variability of the English Copula

    William Labov•Language•1969

  • Syntactic variation and auxiliary contraction

    Open Access•Gary Thoms, David Adger et al.•Language•2019

  • The Smooth Signal Redundancy Hypothesis

    Open Access•Matthew P Aylett, Matthew Aylett et al.•Language and Speech•2004

  • The position of subjects

    Open Access•Hilda Koopman, Dominique Sportiche•Lingua•1991

  • Some theoretical issues in the description of the english verb

    Open Access•Rodney Huddleston•Lingua•1976

  • On ineffable predicates

    Open Access•Jason Merchant•Lingua•2015

  • Dependency locality as an explanatory principle for word order

    Open Access•Richard Futrell, Roger Levy et al.•Language•2020

  • Locative Inversion and the Architecture of Universal Grammar

    Joan Bresnan•Language•1994

  • Autonomous Syntax and the Analysis of Auxiliaries

    Geoffrey K Pullum, Geoffrey Pullum et al.•Language•1977

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae