Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Who needs it? Variation in experiencer marking in Estonian ‘need’-constructions

Bibliographic Data

ID10140609
AuthorsLiina Lindström (0000-0003-1458-6682, University of Tartu, corresponding author), Virve-Anneli Vihman, Virve‐anneli Vihman (0000-0002-0874-1730, University of Tartu, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume53
Issue04
Pages789-822
Publication date2017-01-09
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-2267 • E-ISSN: 1469-7742
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0022226716000402
OpenAlexW2569597425
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited34

In this paper, we tackle the twin issues of obligatoriness of semantic arguments and variation in their expression through a study of Estonian constructions denoting need. The variation under investigation consists in the choice of case-marking, between adessive and allative case, as well as the option to omit the oblique argument. We extracted and coded ‘need’-constructions from spoken and written corpora and used non-parametric classification methods for analysis. We found high rates of oblique experiencer omission in these constructions (nearly 60% across corpora). The most important predictors of overt expression of the experiencer in our models were participant-internal modality and the presence of nominal complements, meaning that both semantic and syntactic factors are relevant. The choice between two overt cases is affected by person, complement type, and referential distance. Topical experiencer arguments do not show the subject-like tendency to be omitted more often, but they are more likely to be marked with adessive case, suggesting that adessive is more grammaticalised as a structural, non-nominative, argument-marking case than the more semantic allative case. Our findings show that oblique, semantic arguments may be frequently omitted, and both semantic and syntactic factors may affect variation in case-marking

Argument (complex analysis · Complement (music · Dative case · Estonian · Expression (computer science · Linguistics · Meaning (existential · Nominative case · Oblique case · Variation (astronomy · Verb · Computer Science · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Philosophy · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Täitsa lambist

    Open Access•Mari Aigro, Virve‐anneli Vihman•Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse…•2023

  • Third-person overt pronoun and zero reference in Estonian. Insights from two experiments

    Open Access•Helen Hint, Maria Reile et al.•Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse…•2023

  • Verb-second in spoken and written Estonian

    Open Access•Virve‐anneli Vihman, George Walkden•Glossa a journal of general…•2021

  • Liage du possessif réfléchi en estonien

    Open Access•Suzanne Lesage•Études finno-ougriennes•2021

  • Murded, varieerumine ja korpusandmed. Eitussõna paiknemine võru ja seto eituslausetes

    Open Access•Maarja-Liisa Pilvik, Helen Plado et al.•Keel ja Kirjandus•2021

  • Eesti keele väliskohakäänete kasutus poolspontaanses kõnes automaatse transkriptsiooni põhjal

    Open Access•Jane Klavan, Tanel Alumäe et al.•Keel ja Kirjandus•2020

  • The use of the indefinite pronoun keegi ‘someone’ in Estonian dialects

    Open Access•Hanna Pook, Liina Lindström•Nordic Journal of Linguistics•2024

  • Syntactic variation in ‘need’-constructions in Estonian dialects

    Open Access•Liina Lindström, Kristel Uiboaed•Nordic Journal of Linguistics•2017

  • Oblique complements in Estonian

    Open Access•Mari Aigro, Virve‐anneli Vihman•Journal of Linguistics•2023

  • Pronouns as referential devices in Estonian, Finnish, and Russian

    Open Access•Helen Hint, Tiina Nahkola et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2019

  • The grass is not always greener

    Open Access•Siming Lin, Shiming Lin et al.•System•2024

  • Bilingual Acquisition of Morphology

    Open Access•Adele Vaks, Virve‐anneli Vihman•Language and Speech•2026

  • Adolescent Heritage Speakers

    Open Access•Mari-Liis Korkus, Virve-Anneli Vihman et al.•Languages•2024

  • Regression Modeling Strategies

    Open Access•Frank E Harrell, Frank E Jr Harrell•Regression Modeling Strategies•2001

  • Auxiliaries

    Bernd Heine•Auxiliaries•1993

  • Prototypical Transitivity

    Åshild Næss•Prototypical Transitivity…•2007

  • Cohesion in English

    M A K Halliday, Μ Α Κ Halliday et al.•Cohesion in English•2014

  • Conditional variable importance for random forests

    Open Access•Carolin Strobl, Anne-Laure Boulesteix et al.•BMC Bioinformatics•2008

  • Unbiased Recursive Partitioning

    Torsten Hothorn, Kurt Hornik et al.•Journal of Computational and…•2006

  • Random Forests

    Open Access•Leo Breiman•Machine Learning•2001

  • Topic Continuity in Discourse

    Talmy Givón•Topic continuity in discourse•1983

  • Datives and allatives

    Edward Blansitt, Edward L Blansitt•Studies in syntactic typology•1988

  • Acquisitive modals

    Johan Van Der Auwera, Johan Van Der Van Der Auwera et al.•Cross-linguistic semantics of…•2009

  • Modal verbs in Balto-Finnic

    Petar Kehayov, Reeli Torn-Leesik•Modals in the Languages of Europe•2009

  • The Diachronic Typology of Non-Canonical Subjects

    Леонид Куликов, L I Kulikov et al.•The diachronic typology of…•2013

  • Varieerumine "tarvis-/vaja-"konstruktsioonides keelekontaktide valguses

    Open Access•Liina Lindström, Kristel Uiboaed et al.•Keel ja Kirjandus•2014

  • Making choices in Russian

    Open Access•R Harald Baayen, Anna Endresen et al.•Russian Linguistics•2013

  • Cross-Linguistic Variation in the Treatment of Beneficiaries and the Argument vs. Adjunct Distinction

    Open Access•Denis Creissels•Linguistic Discovery•2014

  • Arguments and Adjuncts as Language-Particular Syntactic Categories and as Comparative Concepts

    Open Access•Martin Haspelmath•Linguistic Discovery•2014

  • Do We Need a Distinction between Arguments and Adjuncts? Evidence from Psycholinguistic Studies of Comprehension

    Open Access•Damon Tutunjian, Julie E Boland•Language and Linguistics Compass•2008

  • Models, forests, and trees of York English

    Open Access•Sali A Tagliamonte, R Harald Baayen•Language Variation and Change•2012

  • What do subject pronouns do in discourse? Cognitive, mechanical and constructional factors in variation

    Open Access•Catherine E Travis, Rena Torres Cacoullos•Cognitive Linguistics•2012

  • Modality's semantic map

    Open Access•Johan Van Der Van Der Auwera, Vladimir Plungian et al.•Linguistic Typology•1998

  • Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse

    Jeanette K Gundel, Jeanette Κ Gundel et al.•Language•1993

Citations per year1.44
Citation span2017 - 2026 (10)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae