Just for the hell of it
A comparison of two taboo-term constructions
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 10140773 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jack Hoeksema (0000-0002-9464-9569, University of Groningen, autor correspondente), Donna Jo Napoli (0000-0001-6320-1086, Swarthmore College, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2008 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 347-378 |
| Data de publicação | 2008-06-19 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0022-2267 • E-ISSN: 1469-7742 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s002222670800515x |
| OpenAlex | W2112244029 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 18 |
| Referências citadas | 28 |
The two English constructions exemplified in Let's get the hell out of here (type G) and They beat the hell out of him (type B) differ both syntactically and semantically, but in both the taboo expression has the force of an intensifier. History (through a corpus investigation) reveals that the B-construction started as a literal exorcism ( beat the devil out of someone ), where the hell substituted for the devil , and semantic bleaching ultimately made the literal sense give way to simple emphasis, with any taboo term jumping in. The G-construction may have developed simultaneously, always as an intensifier – or, perhaps, later, on analogy with B. Our analysis suggests that the use of taboo terms as intensifiers spread from wh- constructions to these constructions and, finally, to degree intensifier constructions. These two uses of taboo terms as intensifiers are best characterized in terms of constructions and thus offer evidence against theories lacking any notion of constructions as basic building blocks. Further, they give us information about language change: a pragmatically unified but semantically disparate class of expressions (namely, taboo terms) can extend its distribution in parallel. Private Carr: God fuck old Bennett. He's a whitearsed bugger. I don't give a shit for him. (James Joyce, Ulysses )
Art · Lexicon · Linguistics · Literature · Predicative expression · Sociology · Taboo · Telepathy · Lexicography and Language Studies · Philosophy · Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Degree Resultatives as Second-Order Constructions
On Multiple Paths and Change in the Language Network
Surprise questions in English and French
Same old paska or new shit? On the stylistic boundaries and social meaning potentials of swearing loanwords in Finnish
Marginal Argument Structure constructions
Taboo-based Intensifiers in Arabic and Polish
Using distributional semantics to study syntactic productivity in diachrony
Grammaticalising constructions
Nuclear prominence in ellipsis
A distributional semantic approach to the periodization of change in the productivity of constructions
Dutch Enig
Positive polarity predicates
What the X’ in Anglophone government meetings
Talk About the Weather
Taboo expressions in American Sign Language
Bleached taboo-term predicates in American Sign Language
Minimizers and Even
Using expletive insertion to pursue and sanction in interaction
Historical Linguistics 1999
Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax
Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)Veridical Dependency
Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity
A Comprehensive grammar of the English language
Swiping in Germanic
The Oxford English Dictionary and Its Philosophy
Zero Semantics — The syntactic encoding of quantificational meaning
Syntactic Intrusions and The Notion of Grammatical Construction
Positive Polarity – Negative Polarity
Negative Contexts
Base-Generated Syntax
The Representation of (In)Definiteness
English Verb Classes and Alternations
Frequency and Kinds of Words in Various Social Settings, or What the Hell's Going on
"Much Ado About "Sweet Bugger All
Spitten Image
Negative contexts'. Collocation, polarity and multiple negation
A Natural history of negation
From Hell to Polarity
Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions
Adverbial NPs
| Obras citantes distintas | 18 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,13 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2010 - 2025 (16) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 18 |