The prosodic representation of composite structures in Brazilian Portuguese
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10141124 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Natália Brambatti Guzzo (0000-0003-2876-2173, McGill University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 683-720 |
| Publication date | 2018-02-27 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-2267 • E-ISSN: 1469-7742 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0022226718000099 |
| OpenAlex | W2790403505 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 23 |
In previous research, word–word compounds and stressed affix + word structures have been assigned to the same prosodic domain in Brazilian Portuguese (BP), on account of certain similarities in phonological behaviour (Silva 2010, Toneli 2014): both types of composite structures undergo vowel raising at the right edge of each element in the construction, and vowel sandhi processes between their elements. In this paper, I show that word–word compounds and stressed affix + word structures exhibit significant differences in stress patterns in BP, which supports their prosodization in two separate domains. While stressed affix + word structures are assigned secondary stress following the phonological word (PWd) stress algorithm, each element in word–word compounds behaves as an independent PWd with regard to the stress pattern that it exhibits. I thus propose that while stressed affix + word structures are recursively prosodized in the PWd domain, word–word compounds are prosodized in the composite group, the domain proposed by Vogel (2008, 2009) that immediately dominates the PWd and accounts for the prosodization of structures with compositional characteristics. The analysis reconciles two views on prosodic structure that are traditionally assumed to be mutually exclusive: the view that prosodic domains can be recursive (e.g. Inkelas 1990, Selkirk 1996) and the view that the prosodic hierarchy includes an additional domain specific to composite structures above the PWd (e.g. Vogel 2009, Vigário 2010)
Affix · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Speech recognition · Stress (linguistics · Vowel · Word (group theory · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Mathematics · Philosophy · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Speech and dialogue systems · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Feet without stress
Acoustic evidence for affix classes
Gradience in prosodic representation
Phonological Variation and Prosodic Representation
Recursive prosodic words in Kaqchikel (Mayan)
Re-placing PStem in the prosodic hierarchy
Cyclicity and prosodic misalignment in Armenian stems
Recursion and the Definition of Universal Prosodic Categories
Recursive Prosody and the Prosodic Form of Compounds
The role of heads and cyclicity in bracketing paradoxes in Armenian compounds
The Syntax‐Phonology Interface
The Prosodic Hierarchy in Meter
Prosodic differences among function words
Morphology–phonology interface
The morphology-phonology interface
Neutralização Da Vogal Pretônica E Formação De Palavras Em Português Brasileiro
On derived domains in sentence phonology
Recursion in prosodic phrasing
Some notes on phonological phrasing in Brazilian Portuguese
Prosodic structure between the prosodic word and the phonological phrase
Aspectos da difusão lexical
Interface Fonologia-Morfologia
Sobre Os Compostos Do Pb
O prefixo no português brasileiro
Prosodic subcategories in Japanese
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,25 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |