Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

From Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar to Categorial Grammar (and partway back again)

Bibliographic Data

ID10141283
AuthorsPauline Jacobson (0000-0002-2224-5012, Brown University, corresponding author)
Year2025
Pages1-23
Publication date2025-11-13
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-2267 • E-ISSN: 1469-7742
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0022226725100820
OpenAlexW4416193817
LanguageEN
References cited19

The account of extraction using only generalized context free phrase structure (put forth in a series of papers by Gazdar in the late 1970s and early 1980s and then codified in Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar) used, slash as a feature to indicate that there was something missing in wh -extraction constructions. Although this was (deliberately) reminiscent of the slash of Categorial Grammar (CG) (which encodes argument selection), they treated it as distinct from the CG slash. Subsequent work by Steedman proposed to unite them. This paper argues first, that Gazdar et al. were correct to treat the two differently. Second, I advocate a natural view of syntactic categories under the CG world view. Thus, we take the function categories of CG to correspond to functions on strings, and with this we preclude what I call S-crossing composition, used in many CG analyses. With this in mind, we suggest that rightward extraction as in Right Node Raising really is function composition, while wh- extraction should be handled by something much closer to the account in Gazdar et al. The two behave differently under coordination chains involving a silent and or or. This behavior provides evidence that the two should be kept distinct (see also work by Oehrle for this poit), while providing striking evidence for the view of syntactic categories advocated here

Argument (complex analysis · Categorial grammar · Combinatory categorial grammar · Context (archaeology · Grammar · Phrase · Phrase structure rules · Syntactic structure · Language and cultural evolution · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English

    Richard Montague•Approaches to Natural Language•1973

  • Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity

    Barbara H Partee, Barbara Partee et al.•Meaning, Use, and Interpretation…•1983

  • Towards a Variable-Free Semantics

    Open Access•Pauline Jacobson•Linguistics and Philosophy•1999

  • Syntactic Structures

    Noam Chomsky•Syntactic Structures•1957

  • Nonsyntactic Explanations of Island Constraints

    Frederick J Newmeyer•Annual Review of Linguistics•2015

  • Combinatory grammars and parasitic gaps

    Open Access•Mark Steedman•Natural Language and Linguistic…•1987

  • A Categorial Grammar View of Syntactic Categories

    Pauline Jacobson•Linguistic Inquiry•2025

  • On Internal Merge

    Open Access•Mark Steedman•Linguistic Inquiry•2023

  • On the disunity of right-node raising phenomena

    Open Access•Rui P Chaves•Language•2014

  • On Raising

    Emmon Bach, Paul M Postal•Language•1977

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae