Not all obligatory control is movement
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10141339 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Fyodor V Baykov (0000-0002-9376-0118, National Research University Higher School of Economics, corresponding author), Pavel Rudnev (0000-0001-8554-0943, National Research University Higher School of Economics) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 893-906 |
| Publication date | 2020-06-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-2267 • E-ISSN: 1469-7742 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0022226720000237 |
| OpenAlex | W3004484515 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 18 |
This squib presents two challenges for the analysis of promise -type verbs within the Movement Theory of Control. We show that the objects of these verbs in Russian are not prepositional and are incorrectly predicted to be legitimate controllers. We also argue against analysing oblique control as movement
Aesthetics · Control (management · Linguistics · Movement (music · Movement control · Oblique case · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |